#generative-ai

#generative-ai

Even if I were to play devil's advocate, it would be tough to find a reason that justifies the existence of generative AI. It's terrible for the environment, it steals people's work without consent, it can be used to produce nasty deepfakes-I could go on, but I'm already preaching to the choir here. However, even with all this in mind, I think I have finally discovered one genuine benefit for the technology; over the weekend, I watched it bork the transcription of a fake WWE news channel so hard that it made me laugh until my ribs hurt.

An analysis by Linch Zhang posted on the forum LessWrong found certain paragraphs of Magnifica Humanitas to be between 40 percent and 100 percent written by AI, according to the popular AI detector Pangram. The document includes known traits that appear in AI-generated writing, such as a higher use of the word “genuinely” - which crops up in writing by Anthropic's Claude - than previous encyclicals, Zhang says. Another person ran the text of the document section by section through Pangram, finding that 62 percent of its first chapter was flagged as AI generated. When The Verge ran roughly 2,000 words of the document through Pangram, it estimated that 46 percent was AI-written.

Transitioning from the old Adobe Color interface to the new one, with Grok stepping in to guide me through the updated layout right when I needed it. A quick question about an accessible tetrad harmony suddenly became clear guidance for navigating the updated tools.

Within days, however, one entry aroused suspicion. “The Serpent in the Grove,” a story by Jamir Nazir of Trinidad and Tobago, which had taken honors for the Caribbean region, struck a few people as bearing the stylistic tells of AI-generated text.