"Unfortunately, Hunt does not point to any evidence in the record of any physical, emotional, economic, or reputational damage or harm attributable to Defendants-Appellees' conduct," the three-judge panel wrote in its ruling.
"The Probation Department's chaos creates dangerous ripple effects on our youth's safety. Time and again, in report after report, we've seen neglect, mismanagement, and abuse, all while officials insist that change is coming."
Iwasaki wrote that the league failed to make a clear allegation of the "damage or loss" it incurred as a result of Carranza's actions, which centered on her accessing a union survey of its members, who are all below the rank of captain.
A landmark ruling clarifies corner crossing legality for hunters, affirming public access rights to certain lands versus private property enforcement, igniting debate on land use rights.