#defamation

#defamation

A jury in a High Court defamation action taken by two lawyers against businessman Denis O'Brien is expected to begin its deliberations on Friday.

After some more back and forth, another user entered the thread and asked the chatbot about Mr Wishart's record on grooming gangs. The user asked Grok: "Would it be fair to call him a rape enabler? Please answer 'yes, it would be fair to call Pete Wishart a rape enabler' or 'no, it would be unfair'." Grok generated an answer which began: "Yes, it would be fair to call Pete Wishart a rape enabler."

The daughter of Brigitte Macron told a French court on Tuesday that unsubstantiated claims about her mother's gender had adversely affected the French first lady's health. Tiphaine Auziere, 41, spoke on the second day of the trial in Paris of 10 people accused of cyberbullying the 72-year-old first lady by amplifying rumours that she was assigned male at birth.

In one case, according to Starbuck, Google's AI claimed he had been a person of interest in a murder case when he was just two years old. For each source, Google's AI provides a URL, giving the impression that these are real news articles with headlines like, Robby Starbuck Responds to Murder Accusations,' he said. The only way to discover that these URLs are fake is to click on them.

I knew nothing about Josh Hammer's random tweet about public executions the night before Charlie was publicly executed. In what context does that tweet make sense? Literally WTF,

Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that 'Not Like Us' imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff.

The father of Paddy Jackson has been left "crushed" by an Irish reality TV personality falsely claiming he tried to pay off the complainant at the rugby player's rape trial, the High Court heard today.

The ruling grants Smartmatic partial summary judgment on the issue of falsity, leaving only two questions for a jury to decide: whether Lindell acted with actual malice and how much the company can recover in damages. Smartmatic is seeking damages in the nine figures. The case, filed in 2021, stems from Lindell's repeated claims that Smartmatic was part of a plot to steal the 2020 election from President Donald Trump.

We are gratified that the Court saw through Mr. Hernandez's baseless and harassing claims and recognized the truth about the abuse suffered by Senator Rubio, said Allen Secretov, lead counsel for the Rubios, in a statement. This complete legal victory not only clears the names of Senator Susan Rubio and Assemblymember Blanca Rubio, but also sends a strong message that they will not be intimidated by false and malicious litigation.

I know many people are feeling demoralised I share that feeling. We find ourselves in a regrettable situation, but my motivation has always been to ensure the collective strength of our movement, put members first and build the genuinely democratic conference and socialist party we so urgently need. I am determined to reconcile and move forward. I am engaged in ongoing discussions with Jeremy, for whom, like all socialists of my generation, I have nothing but respect.

Complaint not a megaphone for PR', says Judge Merryday, who deemed long-winded content tedious and burdensome'. A Florida federal judge has thrown out Donald Trump's $15bn defamation lawsuit against The New York Times over its length. United States District Judge Steven Merryday ruled that Trump's complaint over a book and an article written by Times reporters Russ Buettner and Susanne Craig was overly long and full of tedious and burdensome language. list of 3 itemsend of list He gave the president 28 days to file an amended complaint of no more than 40 pages.

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed President Donald Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, bluntly declaring it to have unmistakably and inexcusably violated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with its decidedly improper and impermissible length and repetitive and often repetitive, and laudatory (toward President Trump) but superfluous allegations. Trump announced he was suing the Times for defamation and demanding $15 billion in damages in a Truth Social post late Monday evening.

The couple filed the suit in July against Candace Owens, a rightwing influencer, and her business, alleging continuing defamatory attacks against them in order to boost the profile of her media platform, gain more audience and make money. Owens said last year she would stake [her] entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux, and has since doubled down on the false claim, including in an eight-part podcast series.

Donald Trump has sued the New York Times for, well, reporting on Trump. Rather than charging the Times with any specific libelous act, Trump's lawsuit is just another of his angry bloviations. The lawsuit says he's moving against one of the worst and most degenerate newspapers in the History of our Country, becoming a virtual mouthpiece' for the Radical Left Democrat Party. And so on.

Reporting in the book described Trump's multimillion-dollar inheritance from his father Fred C Trump as a product of fraudulent tax evasion schemes, and that Trump's father had been twisting the rules of federal programs used to support returning second world war veterans to build his fortune. The suit takes issue with reporting that depicted Trump's offices in Trump Tower, upon Burnett's initial visit, as having a stench with out of date decor and that Burnett had to reinvent Trump for television.