#judiciary

#judiciary

Sen. Whitehouse's investigation unveiled serious shortcomings in the FBI's probe into Kavanaugh, influenced by White House constraints.

Judge Carl Nichols expresses concern over potential mass pardons for January 6 rioters, deeming them frustrating and disappointing if granted by Trump.

Federal courts are working to protect employees from abuse and improve reporting mechanisms following #MeToo.

The Northern District of Texas's case assignment method allows forum shopping, resulting in high-profile judges like Kacsmaryk receiving an abundance of conservative-related cases.

Judges may feel entitled to exemption from criticism and accountability, affecting public trust in the judiciary.

Dale E. Ho presides over a landmark case against Mayor Eric Adams, highlighting his legal scholarship and influential background.

Italy's government faced setbacks in their asylum processing initiative in Albania, raising doubts about its efficacy and legality.

Italian judges overturned detention orders for seven migrants sent to Albania, blocking the government's outsourcing plan for the second time.

Judge postponed Trump's sentencing to avoid election interference concerns.

The decision provides Trump time to strategize following a potential ruling on conviction appeal.

Manhattan DA's office did not oppose postponing the sentencing.

Kasie Hunt corrected claims about Judge Tanya Chutkan, emphasizing the distinction between judges and the Justice Department amid discussions on Donald Trump's case.

Trump could solidify a Supreme Court conservative majority by nominating two more justices in a potential second term.

Judge won't consider Election Day in Trump's January 6 case timeline, potentially allowing new evidence to surface before the election.

Concerns over transparency in the bankruptcy auction for Infowars prompt judiciary scrutiny.

Judge Merchan's decision to delay Trump's sentencing is seen as prudent, avoiding electoral disruption and potential negative consequences for the judiciary.

Judge Aileen Cannon exemplifies a troubling culture of entitlement and corruption in the judiciary, revealing a lack of accountability and oversight.

Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi indicted for trying to interfere with a criminal investigation into her husband, emphasizing accountability for all.

Malawi's judiciary is under scrutiny for corruption, impacting public trust and the system's integrity.

Republican judges often dismiss crucial gun regulations, misinterpreting the Second Amendment, despite evident societal risks involved in widespread weapon ownership.

A protester was sentenced to 21 months for pouring cider on a police officer, showcasing the consequences of escalating tensions during demonstrations.

Judge Inga O'Neale emphasizes the importance of public service and community representation in the judicial system.

Johnene Stebbins won the Santa Clara County Superior Court judge seat in a contested election, emphasizing commitment to justice and integrity.

The involvement of judges in electoral disputes has increased since Bush v. Gore, threatening democratic norms.

Mexico's proposed amendment for elected judges threatens democracy and judicial impartiality, prompting significant unrest and economic warnings.

U.S. officials and new leadership advocate for cautious deliberation on judicial reforms, emphasizing potential consequences.

Fostering empathy across political divides is essential for a united society.

Judicial decisions should uphold Congress' intent and not undermine it.

Three suspects sentenced to death for involvement in the assassination of Iranian scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh and spying for Israel.

A Polish judge sought protection from Belarus, accusing Poland of unjust policies and espionage accusations, shedding light on foreign intelligence infiltration concerns.

A Kentucky sheriff pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder for the fatal shooting of a judge, an incident alarming the local community.

The Second Judicial District Equal Justice Committee honored Hispanic contributions with a ceremony that emphasized community impact and diversity in the legal profession.

A sheriff in Kentucky has been charged with the murder of a district judge, shocking the local community and prompting an extensive investigation.

Bernard Lavery was sentenced to 40 months for supplying cocaine, serving half in jail and half under supervised conditions.

Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito received gifts from a German princess, raising concerns about ethics and transparency in court dealings.

Justice Kagan advocates for an enforcement mechanism to ensure adherence to the Supreme Court's ethics code and bolster public trust in the judiciary.

The Supreme Court's immunity decision undermines constitutional duties of the president.

The Supreme Court has convened in five buildings across three U.S. cities, showcasing its historical adaptability and resilience.

Powerful figures like Leonard Leo are facing congressional subpoenas for arranging lavish gifts for Supreme Court justices, raising concerns about dark money in the judiciary.

Ginny Thomas thanks a right-wing lawyer for efforts against Supreme Court reform, raising ethical concerns about influence and political involvement.

Judicial impartiality must be upheld, even amidst personal relationships; a New Hampshire justice's indictment illustrates the conflict of interest.

The scandal involving former judge David R. Jones and attorney Elizabeth Freeman reveals significant ethical concerns and far-reaching financial implications.

Justice Joanne Quiñones appointed to the Appellate Term of the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, marking a significant career milestone during Hispanic Heritage Month.

Hon. Suzanne Adams appointed administrative judge for New York County Supreme Court, emphasizing efficiency and diversity in handling civil matters.

The Second Judicial District Equal Justice Committee celebrates Hispanic Heritage Month, recognizing distinguished individuals and emphasizing community contributions and diversity in the legal profession.

President Biden's nominee for a federal appeals court judgeship, Adeel Mangi, is facing opposition, risking losing the opportunity to fill the crucial post before November elections.

The nomination process for Mangi highlights the challenges of diversity and bias in the judiciary, as he is targeted for his religion amid accusations by Republicans.

Judges bring diverse life experiences to the bench, adding richness and depth to the judiciary.

Justice Dawn Jimenez-Salta tragically died in a motorcycle crash at age 60 while riding on Long Island.

Elise Stefanik criticized the judiciary for upholding no-excuse mail-in voting, framing it as a negative impact on election processes.

Urgent action is needed to prevent the UK from heading toward mass incarceration similar to that of the US.

Judiciary directs magistrates to delay certain sentences to manage prison overcrowding.

New lawyers often lack professionalism knowledge, revealing a deeper cultural issue beyond just inexperience.

Having a rule named after an individual can either be prestigious or damaging, as shown in various scenarios.

The latest Supreme Court Term exemplifies gaslighting tactics.

Tina Peters, former elections chief, was sentenced to nine years in prison for election security breaches and deceptive actions relating to the 2020 election.

Judge Barrett criticized Tina Peterson for election tampering, highlighting her betrayal of duty and persistent false claims about election fraud.

Shawn Souza, a former police officer, was convicted of child rape and indecent assault after a jury trial.

The murder of Judge Kevin D. Mullins by Sheriff Mickey Stines raises significant questions due to a lack of clear motive and disturbing circumstances.

Former PSNI officer Barbara Gray is pursuing legal advice over attributed comments regarding the judiciary made during the Investigatory Powers Tribunal hearing.

Judicial decisions in Northern Ireland's court system are viewed as 'perverse' due to the influence of the disproportionate number of Catholics.

Judge Kathleen Ryan was relieved of her duties after recording her using racist and anti-gay slurs against public officials.

A judge in suburban Detroit has been suspended following leaked recordings of her making racist and anti-gay comments.

A Michigan judge was removed from her duties after recording revealed her making racist and derogatory remarks.

Originalism criticized for relying on bogus history and racist values.

The event "Pathways to the Bench" at New York Law School aimed to guide aspiring judges through their journey to the judiciary.

Male chauvinism hindered Khalida Rachid Khan from reaching the top of Pakistan's judiciary, showcasing persistent gender disparities.