#legal-rulings

#legal-rulings

A federal court ruling indicates that prohibiting DEI programs for federal contractors may infringe on First Amendment rights.

Federal court rules against Trump's executive order targeting Perkins Coie, citing it as unconstitutional and an attack on free expression.

The courts have ruled against Trump's attacks on the free press, reaffirming the importance of First Amendment protections.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit claiming discrimination over the absence of straight Pride flags in a Denver public school.

A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to exclude the X gender marker on passports for trans individuals.

The UK Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman excludes transgender women with gender recognition certificates.

The British Medical Association criticizes the Supreme Court's ruling on biological sex as harmful and lacking scientific basis.

The UK Supreme Court ruled that 'woman' refers to sex assigned at birth, impacting trans women's legal protections.

The British Transport Police changed its search policy for trans women following a Supreme Court ruling defining 'woman' by biological criteria.

The UK Supreme Court ruling affirms 'sex' as biological, with significant implications for women's rights and gender identity laws.

Nevada judge rules tower dumps unconstitutional but allows their use as evidence, raising privacy concerns.

The Berlin court ruling casts doubt on the legality of using hacked data from encrypted communications as evidence in prosecutions.

Federal judge blocks Trump's transgender military ban, ruling it likely violates constitutional rights.

Judge Boasberg finds Trump administration likely acted in contempt of court regarding Venezuelan deportations, emphasizing the importance of upholding judicial orders.

The federal judge has issued an indefinite injunction against Trump's executive order attempting to redefine birthright citizenship.

The Trump administration must pay nearly $2 billion in foreign aid for completed work, as ruled by a district judge.

The Supreme Court has ruled against restoring terminated professional development grants, marking a significant victory for the Trump administration's executive powers.

Reproductive rights groups in Alabama quickly resumed their support efforts following a judge's ruling against prosecuting abortion aid.

Abortions in Missouri will resume following a judge's ruling that blocked discriminatory regulations against abortion providers.

The Supreme Court upheld a verdict of excessive force against a police officer in a fatal shooting case, ending litigation for the victim's family.

New York can enforce firearm bans in sensitive locations despite recent Supreme Court rulings.

The Fifth Circuit has significantly shaped labor law and voting rights, presenting challenges and implications for upcoming elections.

Ohio's six-week abortion ban was struck down, reaffirming the state's commitment to reproductive rights as per the voters' amendment.

The Federal Circuit reversed previous invalidity rulings on key pharmaceutical patents, emphasizing the significance of prosecution delays and patent term extensions.

The CAFC affirmed non-infringement rulings for Facebook, emphasizing the need for authenticated evidence in patent litigation.

The CAFC ruling reiterates the necessity of operational configuration modes for new message formats in patent claims.

Wyoming's abortion bans were struck down by a judge due to a state constitutional amendment supporting health care choices.

The ECHR ruled that the French courts violated a woman's rights regarding her private and family life, sparking renewed debate on women's rights in France.

The Hong Kong court recognized housing and inheritance rights for same-sex couples, marking a significant victory for the LGBTQ community.

The Biden administration's Title IX regulation banning discrimination against LGBTQ+ students has been struck down by a federal judge.

Hong Kong's top court has upheld inheritance and public housing benefits for same-sex married couples, marking a significant advancement for LGBTQ+ rights.

The Hong Kong court's ruling promotes equal housing and inheritance rights for same-sex couples, marking a significant advancement for LGBTQ+ rights in the city.

Lithuania's Constitutional Court struck down the 'gay propaganda' law for violating constitutional principles on equality and child development.

The Delaware court found significant governance issues in Tesla's pay package for Musk, emphasizing both misleading information and conflicts of interest.

Tesla cannot compel PostNord to deliver license plates amid ongoing labor disputes, as affirmed by a Swedish court's ruling.