Two federal judges in California ruled on significant copyright cases regarding AI firms using published works to train models. In Bartz v. Anthropic, a judge favored Anthropic, stating that their use of three authors’ works for AI training fell under fair use, although he acknowledged illegal piracy of certain works. Meanwhile, in Kadrey v. Meta, prominent authors sought a judgment against Meta for similar practices. Overall, these decisions suggest that authors may struggle to protect their work from AI utilization without further development in copyright law.
The recent rulings from federal judges in California concerning copyright infringement by AI companies highlight a significant gap in protections for authors using their work.
Despite the initial legal setbacks for authors in cases against AI firms, the legal debates around copyright and AI technology are still unfolding rapidly.
Collection
[
|
...
]