Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Life Sentences for Juveniles in Arizona
The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a juvenile offender in Arizona sentenced to life without parole, with potential implications for other cases.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Hawaii gun licensing rules for now
The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a Hawaii case regarding gun rights, emphasizing the need for clearer Second Amendment protections.
First Transgender Attorney to Argue Before Supreme Court Will Argue Trans Healthcare Case Wednesday
Chase Strangio is the first trans attorney to argue a case before the Supreme Court, challenging a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for youth.
The First Out Trans Lawyer to Argue Before the Supreme Court Is Feeling the Pressure
The Supreme Court case U.S. v. Skrmetti could set landmark legal precedents for LGBTQ rights, particularly for transgender youth access to care.
Supreme Court's Overturning of Chevron Is a Massive Power Grab
The Supreme Court's decisions in Dobbs and Loper Bright signal a shift away from respecting precedent and towards judges asserting greater authority over agency decisions.
When The Stars Don't Align For Justices Kavanaugh And Roberts
Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the historical significance and implications of prosecuting a former president, asserting the need to carefully assess executive power.
Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Life Sentences for Juveniles in Arizona
The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a juvenile offender in Arizona sentenced to life without parole, with potential implications for other cases.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Hawaii gun licensing rules for now
The Supreme Court declined to intervene in a Hawaii case regarding gun rights, emphasizing the need for clearer Second Amendment protections.
First Transgender Attorney to Argue Before Supreme Court Will Argue Trans Healthcare Case Wednesday
Chase Strangio is the first trans attorney to argue a case before the Supreme Court, challenging a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for youth.
The First Out Trans Lawyer to Argue Before the Supreme Court Is Feeling the Pressure
The Supreme Court case U.S. v. Skrmetti could set landmark legal precedents for LGBTQ rights, particularly for transgender youth access to care.
Supreme Court's Overturning of Chevron Is a Massive Power Grab
The Supreme Court's decisions in Dobbs and Loper Bright signal a shift away from respecting precedent and towards judges asserting greater authority over agency decisions.
When The Stars Don't Align For Justices Kavanaugh And Roberts
Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the historical significance and implications of prosecuting a former president, asserting the need to carefully assess executive power.
Federal Circuit Slices Through Patent Infringement Verdict: A Damage Apportionment Preview
The Federal Circuit's decision emphasizes stricter evidentiary requirements for patent royalty determinations, potentially disadvantaging patent holders in future litigations.
Federal Circuit Grants En Banc Rehearing in EcoFactor v. Google, Limiting Damages Expert Testimony
The Federal Circuit is reevaluating expert testimony on patent damages, a significant case impacting the patent community and damages awards.
The case could limit damages theories in patent cases, enhancing judicial control over jury-awarded damages.
Appellate Standing to Challenge ITC Dismissal
Koki advanced its legal position despite losing the appeal because Kyocera's promise not to sue forced clarification of patent rights.
The Federal Circuit's Blind Spot: ParkerVision and the Problem of Invisible Reasoning
The Federal Circuit's Rule 36 practice undermines accountability and violates statutory requirements for written opinions in patent case appeals.
In Win for Amazon, CAFC Okays Alice Step Two Inquiry at Alice Step One
The CAFC affirms that certain patents related to metadata and video organization are abstract under the Alice framework.
Federal Circuit Slices Through Patent Infringement Verdict: A Damage Apportionment Preview
The Federal Circuit's decision emphasizes stricter evidentiary requirements for patent royalty determinations, potentially disadvantaging patent holders in future litigations.
Federal Circuit Grants En Banc Rehearing in EcoFactor v. Google, Limiting Damages Expert Testimony
The Federal Circuit is reevaluating expert testimony on patent damages, a significant case impacting the patent community and damages awards.
The case could limit damages theories in patent cases, enhancing judicial control over jury-awarded damages.
Appellate Standing to Challenge ITC Dismissal
Koki advanced its legal position despite losing the appeal because Kyocera's promise not to sue forced clarification of patent rights.
The Federal Circuit's Blind Spot: ParkerVision and the Problem of Invisible Reasoning
The Federal Circuit's Rule 36 practice undermines accountability and violates statutory requirements for written opinions in patent case appeals.
In Win for Amazon, CAFC Okays Alice Step Two Inquiry at Alice Step One
The CAFC affirms that certain patents related to metadata and video organization are abstract under the Alice framework.
Ending Birthright Citizenship Is Harder Than It Sounds
Trump proposes ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, planning to sign an executive order on his first day in office.
Morning Docket: 11.20.24
Prosecutors prepare for a defense that could make state crimes irrelevant if a convict wins a national election, raising significant legal implications.
Ending Birthright Citizenship Is Harder Than It Sounds
Trump proposes ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, planning to sign an executive order on his first day in office.
Morning Docket: 11.20.24
Prosecutors prepare for a defense that could make state crimes irrelevant if a convict wins a national election, raising significant legal implications.
New York Times Takes European Commission to Court Over Covid Vaccine Deal
The New York Times is suing the European Commission for access to text messages related to the Covid-19 vaccine deal negotiations with Pfizer.
Ex-fiancee must return $70K ring after failed engagement, court says
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court established that engagement rings must be returned to the buyer if the wedding falls through, regardless of fault.
UK man gets 18 years in prison for using AI to generate CSAM
Hugh Nelson received an 18-year prison sentence for creating AI-manipulated child sexual abuse material, marking a significant legal precedent in the UK.
Man Imprisoned for 18 Years for Using AI to Do Disgusting Thing to Photos of Children
A man was sentenced to 20 years for creating AI-generated child sexual abuse images, setting a legal precedent in the UK.
UK man gets 18 years in prison for using AI to generate CSAM
Hugh Nelson received an 18-year prison sentence for creating AI-manipulated child sexual abuse material, marking a significant legal precedent in the UK.
Man Imprisoned for 18 Years for Using AI to Do Disgusting Thing to Photos of Children
A man was sentenced to 20 years for creating AI-generated child sexual abuse images, setting a legal precedent in the UK.
Parents of teen driver who killed girl in high-speed crash are sentenced for manslaughter
Parents sentenced after son's fatal crash; legal precedent set.
Parental liability questioned after father of Georgia shooter arrested
Growing accountability for parents in school shootings may lead to stricter legal repercussions for negligence regarding children's access to firearms.
Parents of teen driver who killed girl in high-speed crash are sentenced for manslaughter
Parents sentenced after son's fatal crash; legal precedent set.
Parental liability questioned after father of Georgia shooter arrested
Growing accountability for parents in school shootings may lead to stricter legal repercussions for negligence regarding children's access to firearms.
Chrystul Kizer sentenced to 11 years for killing her sex trafficker
Kenosha judge sentences Chrystul Kizer, a sex trafficking survivor, to 11 years in prison for killing her trafficker, testing legal defenses for similar cases.
What a Dubai Court Ordering a Company to Pay Its Employee in Crypto Means
Dubai court legitimizes salary payment in crypto via employment contract, but details remain unclear regarding broader applicability.
The police can't track your cellphone without a warrant, judge rules
The use of StingRay technology without a warrant is unconstitutional, as ruled by a Manhattan federal judge, highlighting privacy concerns in surveillance.
Government drops appeal over climate activist who held sign outside UK court
Jurors' right to acquit based on conscience has been formally recognized, vital for a functioning democracy.
No Showing of Prejudice Required to Argue Waiver of Right to Arbitration
Recent California Supreme Court ruling favors employees in arbitration disputes, especially when employers delay enforcing agreements.
The Google Antitrust Ruling Could Influence Tech Competition
A landmark ruling in a Google antitrust case, akin to the Microsoft case in 2000, may shape new rules for the tech industry, impacting giants like Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta.
Tech Industry Braces as Google Antitrust Trial Closes
The U.S. vs. Google antitrust trial will impact the tech giant's operations and potentially set a legal precedent for other tech companies.
The Google Antitrust Ruling Could Influence Tech Competition
A landmark ruling in a Google antitrust case, akin to the Microsoft case in 2000, may shape new rules for the tech industry, impacting giants like Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta.
Tech Industry Braces as Google Antitrust Trial Closes
The U.S. vs. Google antitrust trial will impact the tech giant's operations and potentially set a legal precedent for other tech companies.
During Watergate, the Supreme Court spoke with one voice. Can it do the same in Trump's case?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 1974 that the president is not above the law, setting a precedent for accountability and justice in the White House.
Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to Idaho's Near-Total Abortion Ban
The U.S. Supreme Court is to rule on whether Idaho's near-total abortion ban conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).
During Watergate, the Supreme Court spoke with one voice. Can it do the same in Trump's case?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 1974 that the president is not above the law, setting a precedent for accountability and justice in the White House.
Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to Idaho's Near-Total Abortion Ban
The U.S. Supreme Court is to rule on whether Idaho's near-total abortion ban conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).
How Mark Scarsi Post Hoc Dismantled Abbe Lowell's Juicy Timeline - emptywheel
Judge Mark Scarsi's denials of Hunter Biden's motions were in line with precedent and expectations.
Scarsi's rulings indicate a cautious and precedent-based approach to legal decisions.
Miami-Dade police facing excessive force, wrongful death accusations
Miami-Dade police officers facing allegations in excessive force and wrongful death lawsuit from 2014 tasing incident.
Federal appeals court overturned summary judgment, allowing pursuit of claims against officers.
Court highlights the importance of considering evidence collectively while evaluating excessive force allegations.
Rutgers unions sued over strike; case seeks national impact
Rutgers student sues unions for week of education lost due to strike
Lawsuit seeks $150 million in damages and national impact on union strikes in higher education.
EFF to Ninth Circuit: There's No Software Exception to Traditional Copyright Limits
Courts should not expand the reach of copyright unnecessarily, as this can hinder adversarial interoperability.
The ruling in Oracle v. Rimini sets a dangerous precedent for considering software as derivative work based on interoperability alone.
Opinion: Past victories to protect queer kids at school aren't enough
Pat Logue's legal work at Lambda Legal was crucial in advancing LGBTQ+ rights.
Nabozny vs. Podlesny in 1996 set a precedent for challenging antigay violence in schools.
Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official acts in Jan. 6 case
The U.S. Supreme Court grants ex-presidents immunity for certain in-office actions, rejecting judicial denial of Trump's protection from criminal charges regarding his 2020 election-related actions.