
"To be clear, the issue is not whether Aetna's policy exclusion prohibits this type of gender-affirming care, but rather that Aetna's policy exclusion prohibits only transgender individuals, the only individuals who can experience gender dysphoria, from receiving this type of gender-affirming care. Thus, when Aetna decided that facial gender-affirming procedures 'performed as a component of a gender transition [were] not medically necessary,' it effectively excluded only transgender individuals from coverage."
"The six women sued Aetna after they were categorically denied facial feminization surgery (FFS), based on the insurer's internal guidance, Clinical Policy Bulletin 0615, which describes FFS as 'cosmetic' and excludes all coverage of the procedure. Both women reported severe depression, suicidality, and intensifying gender dysphoria related to facial masculinization."
Six transgender women sued Aetna Insurance after being categorically denied coverage for facial feminization surgery (FFS) based on the insurer's policy classifying it as cosmetic. A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction for two of the plaintiffs, Dr. Jamie Homnick and Dr. Gennifer Herley, who experienced severe gender dysphoria, depression, and suicidality. The court ruled that Aetna's blanket exclusion of FFS for transgender individuals while potentially covering similar procedures for others constitutes sex discrimination. Judge Victor Bolden determined the policy illegally denies gender-affirming care exclusively to transgender patients, the only group experiencing gender dysphoria. This ruling establishes important precedent for transgender patients nationwide seeking insurance coverage of gender-affirming procedures.
#transgender-healthcare #insurance-discrimination #gender-affirming-surgery #legal-precedent #facial-feminization-surgery
Read at LGBTQ Nation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]