US politics
fromwww.nytimes.com
2 months agoJustice Barrett May Have the Crucial Vote in Trump Cases
Justice Barrett's decisive vote indicates potential limits to presidential power within the Supreme Court.
Strunsky highlighted that the investigative report's reliance on uncorroborated claims from anonymous sources severely undermines its credibility and objectivity, raising concerns about its findings.
The university's decision to suspend admissions to 18 degree programs has sparked a judicial review application, citing the need for the senate's involvement in academic matters.
The Tenth Circuit's extreme deference to arbitrators has nullified meaningful judicial review, as emphasized in the amicus brief by Lift Our Voices. The brief cites the court's admissions of powerlessness, claiming federal courts "do not have discretion," "do not have power," and "cannot set aside an arbitration award based on legal error." This language reflects a worrying abdication of judicial authority outlined in Article III when the Federal Arbitration Act was enacted.
"This unprecedented increase in government roles raises serious concerns about whether such appointments are genuinely reflective of democratic principles and equality in representation."