#federal-circuit

#federal-circuit

Judge Newman received more due process than the constitutional minimum during her appeal, according to Chief Judge Moore.

Judge Pauline Newman has been indefinitely suspended from her judicial duties, but medical evaluations claim she is fit to serve.

Judge Newman's suspension raises unique legal questions about judicial conduct and procedural norms.

The Federal Circuit's different application of Rule 36 necessitates Supreme Court intervention to address inconsistencies across Circuit Courts. A clear need for judicial accountability exists.

The Federal Circuit enforces highly demanding procedural standards, leading to frequent filing mistakes even amongst skilled attorneys.

The court's strict compliance requirements highlight systemic issues for attorneys navigating complex appellate processes.

The Federal Circuit's actions against Judge Newman may threaten judicial independence and justice for other federal judges.

Fraudulent DMCA takedown notices from a Nintendo impersonator signal ongoing challenges in digital copyright enforcement.

The Federal Circuit's decision emphasizes stricter evidentiary requirements for patent royalty determinations, potentially disadvantaging patent holders in future litigations.

The Federal Circuit revived AlexSam's patent infringement lawsuit against Aetna, influencing future claims and dismissal motions.

Federal Circuit reiterates skepticism toward the doctrine of equivalents, emphasizing strict standards for expert testimony in patent infringement cases.

WIPO member states approved a treaty aimed at simplifying design protection globally, reinforcing the goal of fostering innovation across borders.

Heidary's patent infringement lawsuit against Amazon and Ring was dismissed due to improper venue and insufficient claim articulation.

The court clarified that pet-initiated activity must begin transmission for patent infringement, ruling against DoggyPhone in their claim against Tomofun.

The Federal Circuit's decisions underscore the importance of timely arguments and procedural compliance in patent litigation.

DISH Network is contesting the Federal Circuit's decision to vacate a $3.9 million attorney fee award, emphasizing reliance on Supreme Court precedents.

The Federal Circuit ruled that the first reflective layer of the '961 patent does not need to be epitaxial or different from the substrate.

The Federal Circuit overturned the district court's decision, favoring ParkerVision in key issues related to patent infringement and expert testimony.