#fair-use

#fair-use

OpenAI is facing a legal battle over alleged copyright infringement in the training of its AI models.

The case could have significant implications for the AI industry's use of copyrighted materials for training purposes. [ more ]

The New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI highlights the question of data ownership and fair use in training language models.

OpenAI admitted in a submission to the House of Lords that it requires access to copyrighted work to train its language models. [ more ]

Using copyrighted content in AI training data is claimed to be fair use

Music publishers are demanding damages from Anthropic for copyright infringement [ more ]

Generative AI technology has led to an increase in copyright infringement lawsuits against AI companies.

Tech companies argue that scraping data for AI models falls under fair use, while media companies believe they should be entitled to part of the value generated. [ more ]

OpenAI accuses New York Times of hacking its chatbot for misleading evidence in a copyright lawsuit.

Legal battle between AI tech companies and copyright owners over the use of copyrighted material for training AI systems. [ more ]

OpenAI argues that training its models on the New York Times' work is fair use under US copyright law.

OpenAI is trying to drum up support among other news organizations and has partnered with the Associated Press, Business Insider's parent company, and New York University. [ more ]

OpenAI responds to New York Times copyright lawsuit, calling it without merit and expressing hope for partnership.

OpenAI argues that the Times manipulated prompts to include regurgitated excerpts of articles, and claims its models don't typically behave the way the Times suggests. [ more ]

OpenAI says access to copyrighted material is necessary to develop AI tools like chatbots.

OpenAI argues that limiting training data to public domain materials would not produce adequate AI systems. [ more ]

AI developers argue that their actions constitute fair use, similar to an art student studying and creating their own work.

The argument that AI-created content is just a new combination of existing knowledge may be flawed. [ more ]

Using copyright to regulate AI can lead to bad outcomes

Both Andrew Ross Sorkin and Elon Musk made misleading claims in the interview [ more ]

Ed Newton-Rex, the former vice president of audio at Stability AI, resigned over a disagreement about copyright and fair use in AI companies.

Newton-Rex disagreed with the argument that large tech companies can use data, including scraped data from the internet, without consent.

His departure from Stability AI reflects a larger issue with how AI companies approach copyright and fair use. [ more ]

Senior executive at Stability AI resigns over company's view on using copyrighted work without permission

Many AI firms argue that taking copyright content is 'fair use' [ more ]

Ed Newton-Rex has resigned from his role as VP of audio at Stability AI over the company's use of copyrighted content in generative AI models.

The company claims that using copyrighted content without permission is fair use, but Newton-Rex opposes this argument.

Newton-Rex highlights the legal and moral issues of using copyrighted content without permission in generative AI models. [ more ]

The vice president of audio at Stability AI, Ed Newton-Rex, has resigned due to his belief that training generative AI models using copyrighted content doesn't qualify as "fair use."

AI companies typically support fair use, but Newton-Rex had an issue with Stability AI's submission to the United States Copyright Office arguing for AI development falling under fair use.

Newton-Rex disagrees with the argument that using copyrighted works to train generative AI models is fair use because it can create works that compete with the copyrighted works. [ more ]