#election-law

#election-law

Recent legal challenges to voter rights by Trump-aligned groups are being rejected by courts, indicating a shift toward protecting voting access.

The Supreme Court upheld Virginia's voter purge efforts, showcasing a GOP strategy to tighten voting regulations before the 2024 election.

Nebraska's Supreme Court ruling reinstated voting rights for tens of thousands, countering illegal suppression of votes and impacting the upcoming presidential election.

Musk's petition offering $1 million to swing-state voters is under legal scrutiny, with allegations of it being an illegal lottery.

The 5th Circuit's ruling jeopardizes the counting of mail-in ballots received after Election Day, impacting voting in several states.

Georgia's new election rule may disenfranchise voters and influence presidential election outcomes, particularly affecting Democratic vote counts in key precincts.

Trump is set to be sentenced in a historic hush-money case, potentially facing no significant penalties despite felony convictions.

Trump's hush-money case raises questions about his campaign and legal strategy amid ongoing election proceedings.

Nearly 200 absentee ballots went uncounted in Madison, prompting an investigation by state election officials into the city clerk's compliance with state law.

Vince Fong won two races despite not wanting the Assembly seat, leading to potential special election costs.

Goldstein argues ongoing prosecutions against Trump should be dismissed, claiming winning the presidency erases legal consequences.

The Supreme Court's decision permits Virginia to purge its voter rolls just before the election, raising concerns over voter disenfranchisement.

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court rules undated mail-in ballots should not be counted, heightening the ongoing legal disputes surrounding voting regulations.

The Supreme Court's ruling allows Virginia to continue voter registration purges aimed at non-citizens, despite federal law prohibitions.

The Supreme Court's ruling endorses the legal purging of voter rolls shortly before elections, potentially escalating voter suppression efforts.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court mandates that election officials must not count mail ballots with date errors, emphasizing strict compliance with election laws.

Close election results may prompt legal challenges, especially in key swing states like Pennsylvania due to mail-ballot complexities.

Judge postpones ruling on Trump's presidential immunity appeal, reflecting ongoing legal challenges and implications for his 2024 campaign.

Trump's lawsuits may aim to create electoral problems rather than address legitimate voting concerns.

Republican attempts to change electoral processes to favor Trump were thwarted by Nebraska senator Mike McDonnell's refusal to support the proposed change.

Mark Martin's legal influence during the 2020 election demonstrates a lack of accountability for lawyers involved in undermining democracy.

Expect delays in election results due to changes in voting processes and laws, especially in close races.

Most election recounts rarely change the outcome, confirming the reliability of initial counts.

Senate Republicans can now use a controversial advertising strategy to increase campaign spending in key battleground states before the 2024 elections.

Elon Musk's $1 million giveaway linked to election campaigning faces legal challenges in Pennsylvania for allegedly violating lottery laws.

Elon Musk's million-dollar giveaway to registered voters in Pennsylvania raises legal concerns about dark money in politics.

Marc Elias's law firm seeks to enhance Democratic campaign strategies through coordination with PACs, prompting discussions about the implications of financial influence in elections.

Musk's $1 million raffle raises significant legal concerns regarding election law violations, specifically relating to financial incentives for voting.

Elon Musk's financial giveaways to Pennsylvania voters could violate election law by encouraging voter registration in exchange for money.

Musk's $1 million daily giveaway to swing state voters raises potential legal scrutiny regarding election law violations, according to Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro.

Elon Musk's financial incentives for voters raise legal concerns regarding election laws and the influence of money in politics.

Elon Musk's election petition lottery faces legal scrutiny as it is considered potentially illegal and aimed at influencing voters in the upcoming election.

Musk's super-PAC is facing legal scrutiny over its cash incentives to voters, possibly violating federal election laws.

Virginia's voter removal program illegally purged voters too close to elections, leading to reinstatement orders from a federal judge.

Voter participation will ultimately decide the 2024 election, contrary to sensational claims about legal loopholes influencing outcomes.

Error-prone voter removal protocols raise concerns about preventing eligible citizens from voting, exemplified by Nadra Wilson's case.

The Biden administration sued Virginia for violating federal law by removing noncitizens from voter rolls within 90 days of federal elections.

Musk is using financial incentives in Pennsylvania to boost conservative voter registration, raising legal questions regarding election laws.

Musk's $1 million prize proposal for swing state voters may violate federal law regarding voter registration incentives.

A Georgia judge ruled multiple new election rules as illegal and unconstitutional, rejecting right-wing activists' priorities.

Georgia's new rule mandates hand counting of paper ballots at polling places, raising concerns about legality and potential delays on election night.