#scientific-integrity

#scientific-integrity

Trump administration accused of undermining U.S. science, imperiling research and public health through funding cuts and layoffs.

The current administration has undermined the integrity of American scientific research and policymaking.

Trump's allies are targeting EPA policies to facilitate a rollback of environmental regulations and scientific integrity measures enforced during previous administrations.

NIH has rescinded a scientific integrity policy to align with new federal priorities, raising concerns about political influence over research.

The initial policy emphasized diversity and inclusion, vital for equitable scientific participation, which is absent in the new directive.

NIH is being sued over $2.4 billion in canceled grants affecting research and patient care, as plaintiffs argue it jeopardizes scientific advancement.

Scientific integrity requires the presentation of all data, including contradictory findings, to restore public trust in science.

Science faces challenges in public trust; solutions include addressing scientist incentives, long-term careers, and politicization

Eliminating the Office of Research and Development could severely impact environmental regulations and the EPA's scientific integrity.

EPA scientists faced pressure to misrepresent chemical safety, leading to retaliation and serious implications for public health.

The United States' biomedical research, fueled by NIH funding, faces ideological attacks that threaten its integrity and contributions to scientific diversity.

Science diplomacy is crucial for international cooperation, but its integrity is threatened by political interference.

Pressure to publish significantly contributes to the perceived reproducibility crisis in biomedical research.

About 4% of the most cited researchers have at least one retraction, highlighting the complexities of scientific integrity.

The peer review process is crucial to ensuring the quality and integrity of psychological research.

The Trump administration retaliated against scientists defending climate research, leading to several leaving federal service, but some, like Dr. Burkett, were reinstated under Biden.

Scientists express concerns over potential negative impacts on research due to Trump's reelection, especially regarding climate change and public health.

Low-cost mental healthcare initiatives are emerging in Africa.

Climate change is intensifying hurricanes and their effects on communities.

Scientific integrity issues were raised by the Ranga Dias case.

Anticipation significantly enhances animals' pleasure.

A controversial COVID study has been retracted after four years, emphasizing the importance of rigorous scientific integrity.

The retraction of the hydroxychloroquine study emphasizes the need for ethical standards in scientific research.

Political divisions in the U.S. are fueled by group identity and media echo chambers.

Ranga Dias has been dismissed from the University of Rochester following a misconduct investigation.

Ranga Dias was terminated from the University of Rochester following an investigation into research misconduct related to retracted superconductivity papers.

Columbia University faces serious allegations of research misconduct, with five papers retracted from Dr. Sam Yoon's lab amid growing scrutiny.

Researcher Ranga Dias, known for a room-temperature superconductor claim, has left the University of Rochester due to research misconduct allegations.