#scientific-integrity

#scientific-integrity

Advocates stress the importance of scientific integrity and academic freedom in addressing global issues.

The U.S. attorney's letter to CHEST signifies a threatening trend of government control over scientific discourse.

The Trump administration's cuts to federal advisory committees undermine informed decision-making and scientific integrity in governance.

Trump administration accused of undermining U.S. science, imperiling research and public health through funding cuts and layoffs.

The U.S. attorney's letter to CHEST journal raises concerns regarding editorial partisanship and the potential impact on scientific integrity.

Trump administration dismisses contributors to climate assessment, raising concerns about future of crucial climate report.

Action criticized for undermining essential climate science and planning.

The current administration has undermined the integrity of American scientific research and policymaking.

Federal prosecutor accused medical journals of political bias, raising concerns over scientific discourse integrity.

Threats to medical journals may chill publication of research opposing political agendas.

Eliminating the Office of Research and Development could severely impact environmental regulations and the EPA's scientific integrity.

EPA scientists faced pressure to misrepresent chemical safety, leading to retaliation and serious implications for public health.

The United States' biomedical research, fueled by NIH funding, faces ideological attacks that threaten its integrity and contributions to scientific diversity.

Pressure to publish significantly contributes to the perceived reproducibility crisis in biomedical research.

About 4% of the most cited researchers have at least one retraction, highlighting the complexities of scientific integrity.

Anna Abalkina, a Russian researcher, exposes academic fraud while being watched by the Russian state, emphasizing the growing issue of scientific integrity.

A controversial COVID study has been retracted after four years, emphasizing the importance of rigorous scientific integrity.

The retraction of the hydroxychloroquine study emphasizes the need for ethical standards in scientific research.

Political divisions in the U.S. are fueled by group identity and media echo chambers.

Ranga Dias was terminated from the University of Rochester following an investigation into research misconduct related to retracted superconductivity papers.

Researcher Ranga Dias, known for a room-temperature superconductor claim, has left the University of Rochester due to research misconduct allegations.