The U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin, sent a letter to the CHEST journal questioning its editorial policies amid rising tensions between scientists and the Trump administration. Martin suggested that certain journals may act as partisans and called into question their roles in safeguarding public opinion against misinformation. He sought clarity on the journal's responsibilities and editorial practices, prompting the journal to consult legal counsel. The letter has drawn criticism from free speech advocates who worry about potential overreach impacting the independence of scientific discourse.
The U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia inquired about the editorial policies of the CHEST journal, raising concerns about partisanship and misinformation in scientific publishing.
Free speech experts expressed concern, suggesting Martin's letter reflects an undue influence on scientific publishing and may threaten academic independence.
Collection
[
|
...
]