#john-roberts

#john-roberts

Judicial legitimacy concerns may be compromising Chief Justice Roberts' constitutional decisions.

Increasing lower-court interventions challenge the principle of presidential action under Trump's administration.

Chief Justice Roberts' influence significantly affected Supreme Court decisions regarding Trump's legal challenges, raising questions of judicial independence and political involvement.

Chief Justice Roberts' influence on Trump's trial showcases the complexities of judicial power and presidential immunity.

Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the historical significance and implications of prosecuting a former president, asserting the need to carefully assess executive power.

Chief Justice John Roberts' vote is crucial in the debate over publicly funded religious charter schools.

Chief Justice John Roberts balances his public role with personal privacy, humorously noting he was once mistaken for John Boehner.

Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes President Trump's attacks on the judiciary, emphasizing the importance of judicial independence and the separation of powers.

Judges invoking civil rights history to defend controversial rulings is a misguided and disingenuous tactic.