NetChoice, a leading tech industry group, has filed its tenth lawsuit against state internet regulations, particularly targeting Maryland's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. The group argues these laws impose unconstitutional limitations on free speech and grants regulators subjective power over defining children's best interests. After successfully contesting similar laws in Florida and Texas, which resulted in First Amendment protections for content moderation, NetChoice aims to prevent what it sees as overreach that alters how tech platforms operate and user experiences.
NetChoice argues that Maryland's internet regulations allow subjective governmental judgments on 'best interests of children', fostering an environment for 'discriminatory enforcement'.
The group has successfully contested age verification and content moderation laws, emphasizing their belief that these regulations impose unconstitutional speech limitations.
Collection
[
|
...
]