#netchoice

#netchoice

NetChoice has blocked internet regulations by asserting they infringe on free speech rights.

NetChoice's bid to block California's law on children's social media access raises questions about free speech and algorithmic content regulation.

A federal judge blocked a Utah law aiming to protect kids on social media, deeming it unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

The District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction against the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act.

The AADC raises First Amendment concerns due to compelled speech aspects and regulations on protected expression.

Supreme Court sends state laws challenging social media moderation back to lower courts due to First Amendment concerns.

Under the First Amendment, social media platforms should have editorial discretion similar to newspapers.

The Supreme Court unanimously held that the challenges to the social media laws were not properly litigated.

The laws in question aimed to regulate social media content moderation in response to the removal of Donald Trump from major platforms and alleged censorship of conservative voices.

NetChoice, representing major companies, sues Georgia to halt law on high-volume sellers' data collection on online classified sites, citing federal law clash and constitutional issues.

NetChoice sues Georgia to block law requiring data collection on high-volume online sellers using offline payment methods.

NetChoice is suing Georgia over a law requiring online classified sites to gather data on high-volume sellers who collect payment offline.

Internet trade group sues Georgia over law requiring data on high-volume sellers who collect offline payments.

NetChoice filed a lawsuit against Georgia's law requiring online classified sites to gather data on high-volume sellers who collect payment offline, citing violations of federal law and First Amendment rights.

NetChoice, representing tech companies, is suing Georgia over a law requiring data collection from online sellers using offline payment methods.

The lawsuit argues the Georgia law violates First Amendment rights and is unconstitutionally vague, seeking a temporary and permanent block from enforcement.