Judge Liman made clear he does not see how the plaintiffs would be adversely impacted by tolls that will reduce traffic, speed up commutes and deliveries and improve the air, the economy and public transit. He emphasized that the plaintiffs fail to establish a likelihood of success on their claims and do not show that they would be irreparably injured absent an injunction, along with failure to support their arguments regarding the toll's impact.
Congestion pricing opponents have thoroughly challenged the tolls on various grounds, including claims of insufficient environmental assessments and violations of constitutional rights. However, Judge Liman rejected all arguments, underscoring the necessity of the tolls for long-term urban improvement while noting the lack of evidence provided by plaintiffs regarding important financial impacts.
Collection
[
|
...
]