A Dog's Day in Court: Implications of the 'Bad Spaniels' Arguments on Parody Determinations and Noncommercial Use
Briefly

"It will be interesting to see if the Supreme Court ultimately provides any standards on the parameters of what is, or is not, properly a parody under First Amendment principles, as the Circuits could really use some guidance on this point."Following the Supreme Court oral arguments in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC last week, I was reminded of an article I penned years ago for Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal exploring the boundaries of parodies when up against allegations of trademark infringement and dilution.
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
[
add
]
[
|
|
]