Hiring freezes, fewer grad students: Funding uncertainty hits collegesFederal funding cuts pose significant threats to higher education and scientific research sustainability.
Poll: 75% of Scientists Consider Leaving U.S.Many American researchers are contemplating jobs abroad due to changes in federal science policy.Early-career researchers are disproportionately affected by funding cuts under the Trump administration.
Science could solve some of the world's biggest problems. Why aren't governments using it?Governments are struggling to effectively utilize scientific advice due to disconnect between scientists and policymakers.
Hiring freezes, fewer grad students: Funding uncertainty hits collegesFederal funding cuts pose significant threats to higher education and scientific research sustainability.
Poll: 75% of Scientists Consider Leaving U.S.Many American researchers are contemplating jobs abroad due to changes in federal science policy.Early-career researchers are disproportionately affected by funding cuts under the Trump administration.
Science could solve some of the world's biggest problems. Why aren't governments using it?Governments are struggling to effectively utilize scientific advice due to disconnect between scientists and policymakers.
NASA cuts Office of Chief Scientist, diversity rolesNASA is undergoing a phased reduction in force affecting science programs, especially in Earth science related to climate change.
National Science Foundation freezes grant review in response to Trump executive ordersNSF cancels grant review panels to align with new executive orders, causing delays in research funding and increased uncertainty for scientists.
What words are putting science in the crosshairs of Trump's orders?The NSF is reviewing its projects for compliance with executive orders that restrict diversity and gender recognition in scientific research.
What Trump's First Days Say about Science in the New AdministrationTrump's second administration threatens to undermine decades of scientific progress in the U.S. through cuts and anti-science nominations.
What Trump's Executive Orders Mean for ScienceTrump's executive orders aim to reshape federal policy on science, climate change, and public health, signaling a shift away from previous scientific consensus.
NASA cuts Office of Chief Scientist, diversity rolesNASA is undergoing a phased reduction in force affecting science programs, especially in Earth science related to climate change.
National Science Foundation freezes grant review in response to Trump executive ordersNSF cancels grant review panels to align with new executive orders, causing delays in research funding and increased uncertainty for scientists.
What words are putting science in the crosshairs of Trump's orders?The NSF is reviewing its projects for compliance with executive orders that restrict diversity and gender recognition in scientific research.
What Trump's First Days Say about Science in the New AdministrationTrump's second administration threatens to undermine decades of scientific progress in the U.S. through cuts and anti-science nominations.
What Trump's Executive Orders Mean for ScienceTrump's executive orders aim to reshape federal policy on science, climate change, and public health, signaling a shift away from previous scientific consensus.
Trump's nominee for NIH chief talks frozen grants and fostering 'scientific dissent'Jay Bhattacharya emphasizes funding for NIH scientists but lacks clarity on his strategy during his confirmation hearing.
Now That Trump Has Banished the Woke From Science, These Truth-Telling New Scientific Papers Reveal What COVID Vaccines Actually Do to ChildrenCOVID-19 vaccinations significantly lower the risk of long COVID in children and teens, contradicting anti-vaccine narratives.
Scientists worried after Trump halts NIH grant reviewsThe freeze on NIH activities under the Trump administration raises concerns about funding disruptions for scientific research.
Trump's nominee for NIH chief talks frozen grants and fostering 'scientific dissent'Jay Bhattacharya emphasizes funding for NIH scientists but lacks clarity on his strategy during his confirmation hearing.
Now That Trump Has Banished the Woke From Science, These Truth-Telling New Scientific Papers Reveal What COVID Vaccines Actually Do to ChildrenCOVID-19 vaccinations significantly lower the risk of long COVID in children and teens, contradicting anti-vaccine narratives.
Scientists worried after Trump halts NIH grant reviewsThe freeze on NIH activities under the Trump administration raises concerns about funding disruptions for scientific research.
My experience of speaking at a conference with a babyBalancing parenting with professional responsibilities can lead to unexpected opportunitiesParental leave can be a chance to reflect on one's career and share insights with others
Trump 2.0: an assault on science anywhere is an assault on science everywhereTrump's administration has initiated a significant rollback of research funding and autonomy, threatening the future of US science.
"Unprecedented": White House moves to control science funding worry researchersDiversity in research funding is under threat due to government scrutiny on grants with DEI-related terms.
Roundtable to consider 'Science Under Siege' | Cornell ChronicleDiscussion on challenges to research funding and support due to political changes.Event fosters interdisciplinary dialogue among science and humanities scholars.
Trump policies sow chaos, confusion across scientific communityExecutive orders during Trump's administration caused widespread uncertainty and fear among scientists, jeopardizing their research and careers.
What Trump 2.0 means for science: the likely winners and losersThe Trump administration's upcoming term may polarize scientific fields, with prospects for technology and space exploration, contrasted by fears over climate and health research.
UK's new science minister on budget battles, Brexit and AI leadershipPatrick Vallance emphasizes commitment to boost science and technology funding and highlights the importance of curiosity-driven research despite economic challenges.
Trump 2.0: an assault on science anywhere is an assault on science everywhereTrump's administration has initiated a significant rollback of research funding and autonomy, threatening the future of US science.
"Unprecedented": White House moves to control science funding worry researchersDiversity in research funding is under threat due to government scrutiny on grants with DEI-related terms.
Roundtable to consider 'Science Under Siege' | Cornell ChronicleDiscussion on challenges to research funding and support due to political changes.Event fosters interdisciplinary dialogue among science and humanities scholars.
Trump policies sow chaos, confusion across scientific communityExecutive orders during Trump's administration caused widespread uncertainty and fear among scientists, jeopardizing their research and careers.
What Trump 2.0 means for science: the likely winners and losersThe Trump administration's upcoming term may polarize scientific fields, with prospects for technology and space exploration, contrasted by fears over climate and health research.
UK's new science minister on budget battles, Brexit and AI leadershipPatrick Vallance emphasizes commitment to boost science and technology funding and highlights the importance of curiosity-driven research despite economic challenges.
Trump's science advisers: how they could influence his second presidencyTrump's second term may prioritize science more than his first, indicated by key science adviser nominations.
Trump administration's halt of CDC's weekly scientific report stalls bird flu studiesThe Trump administration halted publication of key bird flu studies to ensure political review, raising concerns over scientific integrity and censorship.
Are the Trump team's actions affecting your research? How to contact NatureTrump's presidency has significantly impacted US research institutions and scientific practices.Major disruptions in research funding and practices occurred under Trump's administration.
How Trump's executive orders are disrupting academic researchRecent executive orders have jeopardized federal grants for scientists, creating uncertainty about funding essential for research and academic progress.
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let goEPA disbands key scientific advisory committees to realign guidance with current administration priorities.
What Trump's election victory could mean for AI, climate and moreTrump's presidency may lead to significant policy changes affecting science and technology, but implementation challenges remain.Trump's administration will approach science policy with a focus on deregulation and industry interests.
Trump's science advisers: how they could influence his second presidencyTrump's second term may prioritize science more than his first, indicated by key science adviser nominations.
Trump administration's halt of CDC's weekly scientific report stalls bird flu studiesThe Trump administration halted publication of key bird flu studies to ensure political review, raising concerns over scientific integrity and censorship.
Are the Trump team's actions affecting your research? How to contact NatureTrump's presidency has significantly impacted US research institutions and scientific practices.Major disruptions in research funding and practices occurred under Trump's administration.
How Trump's executive orders are disrupting academic researchRecent executive orders have jeopardized federal grants for scientists, creating uncertainty about funding essential for research and academic progress.
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let goEPA disbands key scientific advisory committees to realign guidance with current administration priorities.
What Trump's election victory could mean for AI, climate and moreTrump's presidency may lead to significant policy changes affecting science and technology, but implementation challenges remain.Trump's administration will approach science policy with a focus on deregulation and industry interests.
'Despair is not an option' - how scientists can help protect federal researchThe Biden administration's scientific progress faces significant setbacks under the new Trump presidency, impacting environmental and societal advancements.
How Elon Musk's partnership with Trump could shape science in the US - and beyondElon Musk is leveraging his influence to promote political agendas that threaten the integrity of scientific agencies in the U.S.
The US election is monumental for science, say Nature readers - here's whyResearchers worldwide are most concerned about the US election's impact on climate change and scientific integrity.
Daily briefing: Heart attacks trigger deep healing sleepScientists express concerns over potential negative impacts on research due to Trump's reelection, especially regarding climate change and public health.
Advising governments about science is essential but difficult. So train people to do itEffective science advising requires bridging gaps between research and policy, needing both receptive leadership and skilled communicators.
The US election is monumental for science, say Nature readers - here's whyResearchers worldwide are most concerned about the US election's impact on climate change and scientific integrity.
Daily briefing: Heart attacks trigger deep healing sleepScientists express concerns over potential negative impacts on research due to Trump's reelection, especially regarding climate change and public health.
Advising governments about science is essential but difficult. So train people to do itEffective science advising requires bridging gaps between research and policy, needing both receptive leadership and skilled communicators.
The world needs a US president who respects evidenceThe 2024 US election could significantly impact the future of democracy and science.
How Trump could impact science policy in a second termTrump's administration faces scrutiny from the scientific community regarding respect for evidence-based research as he begins a second term.
The world needs a US president who respects evidenceThe 2024 US election could significantly impact the future of democracy and science.
How Trump could impact science policy in a second termTrump's administration faces scrutiny from the scientific community regarding respect for evidence-based research as he begins a second term.
Science-policy advisers shape programmes that solve real-world problemsScience policy is significant and impactful, involving critical dialogue with global leaders on urgent issues like climate change and technology advancements.
US election debate: what Harris and Trump said about scienceThe debate showcased contrasting personalities of the candidates more than detailed policy discussions, particularly around science and women's health.
What Kamala Harris's historic bid for the US presidency means for scienceKamala Harris may face off against Donald Trump in the upcoming November election, with notable support from senior Democratic politicians.
AI uncovers how plant science evolvedThe evolution of plant biology is driven by technological advancements like genome sequencing, AI is expected to have a significant impact in the next five years.
We can make the UK a science superpower - with a radical political manifestoA focus on the UK's global standing in science is missing from the election discourse.
Do Scientists Make Good Presidents?Not all researchers are confident in Mexico's first female president's support for science. Scientists-turned-leaders can face challenges balancing expertise with listening to constituents.