"It's outrageous that they actually named individually in their official capacities all 15 judges on the court," said Davis. "And so you have to ask yourself, 'What is going on here? What kind of performance? What was the audience for this?'"
The MI filing raises concerns about the NAR settlement's overreach, asserting it circumvents legislative authority and imposes structural reforms on real estate without proper deliberation.
"Jefferson Griffin's concession is a long-overdue acknowledgment of the will of the people of North Carolina," said Jeff Loperfido, Chief Counsel for Voting Rights at SCSJ. "While we remain deeply troubled by the North Carolina Supreme Court's decision to retroactively disqualify lawful ballots, we are relieved that this relentless effort to undermine the voices of eligible voters has finally come to an end. This case should serve as a warning: efforts to rewrite election outcomes after the fact are unlawful, erode public trust and threaten the very foundation of our democracy."
