The article discusses the increasing trend of federal judges issuing nationwide injunctions against President Trump, highlighting concerns over judicial overreach. These injunctions allow a single judge to block laws and executive orders across the entire country. Justice Neil Gorsuch noted this tendency towards overreach, which the Trump administration aims to counter. A strategic Supreme Court filing proposes to end nationwide injunctions as unconstitutional. The article concludes that while both parties have experienced these injunctions, they have become particularly prevalent in cases involving Trump.
"The district judges issuing scores of 'nationwide' injunctions against President Trump appear to take this gag with deadly seriousness."
"Under this dubious practice, a single federal judge claims the ability to block a law or executive order not just in his or her city or state, but throughout the country."
"It's doing so through a canny Supreme Court filing that contested the nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship."
"Nationwide injunctions have proven a disaster for the federal judiciary."
Collection
[
|
...
]