Following public uproar over the potential end of their 100-year old football rivalry, USC has made an amended offer to Notre Dame that would extend their annual series for multiple years beyond this season, USC athletic director Jennifer Cohen told The Times. Negotiations remain ongoing between the two schools, but Cohen said she is "really hopeful" that USC's new offer, which better accommodates Notre Dame's preference for a long-term deal, would lead to an agreement "very soon."
The Ducks weren't the sole reason for the adjustment. But their experience and feedback played a significant role in the change. If you'll recall, Oregon won the Big Ten and was the No. 1 seed in the inaugural 12-team playoff. Needless to say, any other postseason event in the history of life on Earth would match the No. 1 team against the No. 8-9 winner in the quarterfinals.
If there's one thing we've learned from the debate between the Big Ten, SEC, ACC and Big 12 over the future of the College Football Playoff, it's that committees are awful. They get it wrong nearly every year despite the fact that they've mostly gotten it right.
"Do I want to play the game? Hell yeah, I want to play the game," Riley said. "It's one of the reasons I came here. But also, my allegiance and my loyalty is not to Notre Dame and not to anyone else. I'm the head coach of USC."
The move to a direct seeding model for the College Football Playoff benefits powerhouse conferences like the Big Ten and SEC while disadvantaging others.
Cignetti emphasized the pivotal role of football in shaping the identity and success of Indiana, noting that last year's achievements have instilled a new belief within the fanbase.