The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Douglas Horn, a truck driver fired for using a product misleadingly marketed as THC-free, can sue its manufacturer, Medical Marijuana Inc., under the RICO statute. In a 5-4 decision, Justices affirmed that misrepresentation in product labeling constitutes grounds for legal recourse. The ruling clarifies that individuals can seek redress for business harm caused by deceptive practices, emphasizing consumer protection against such misleading claims. The case may set a precedent for expanding legal accountability in similar consumer deception situations.
The Supreme Court ruled that a truck driver can sue a product manufacturer under federal racketeering law after failing a drug test caused by mislabeled THC content.
In a landmark decision, the court affirmed the right to sue for business injury, a significant expansion of the application of RICO.
Justice Barrett emphasized that the manufacturer, Medical Marijuana Inc., could not escape repercussions by mislabeling their product, marking a critical victory for consumer rights.
This case sets a precedent for holding companies accountable under anti-racketeering laws for misleading marketing practices that lead to real damages for consumers.
Collection
[
|
...
]