Court Sides With Democrats in Fight Over Control of Minnesota House
Briefly

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that Republicans in the state House could not conduct business due to absence of a quorum caused by Democratic members' boycott during the legislative session. This decision reflects ongoing struggles for control in a politically fractured state, especially after Democrats lost their House majority. Republican lawmakers unilaterally appointed their leader as speaker despite opposition, but the court's ruling nullified this. A special election could restore balance, as party leaders scramble amid ongoing legal and political turmoil following recent elections.
Minnesota's Supreme Court determined that the Republican-controlled House couldn’t conduct business due to a lack of quorum caused by absent Democratic representatives, labeling their unilateral session invalid.
The court's decision highlights the turmoil in Minnesota's Capitol as party leaders grapple with control, following a tumultuous election cycle that led to an evenly split House.
Gov. Tim Walz faces a challenging political landscape after losing his vice-presidential bid and losing the House majority, resulting in chaotic legislative proceedings.
After a judge's ruling undermined a residency claim for a new Democrat, the tentative power-sharing agreement between parties disintegrated, impacting control of the state House.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]