Ford recently announced the cancellation of its FNV4 project, aimed at developing a next-gen electrical architecture that would enhance EVs and internal combustion cars. This failure underscores the difficulties faced by legacy automakers in creating software-defined vehicles (SDVs). Though costly and complex, SDVs promise reduced costs and increased flexibility, allowing faster innovation. As consumers demand seamless electronic interfaces, automakers must adapt quickly or risk falling behind in the evolution of automotive technology initiated by Tesla with their software-first approach.
None of the legacy automakers has solved this problem yet. All of them have thrown billions at it. Only some of them will complete the transformation.
Software-first architectures reduce costs, increase flexibility and-perhaps most importantly-allow automakers to move faster, without being slowed down by a complex web of suppliers.
The modern car is so computerized that a seamless electronic interface is an absolute necessity. Consumers have had it with clunky, slow automotive technology.
Tesla invented the software-defined vehicle with the launch of the original Model S. It changed how automakers view automotive software and systems.
Collection
[
|
...
]