The U.S. Supreme Court session on Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services raises critical discussions on Title VII's equality provisions in discrimination claims. Specifically, it centers on the case brought by Marlean Ames, who asserts that she faced discrimination as a heterosexual employee when less qualified queer colleagues were promoted over her. The Sixth Circuit's requirement for heightened evidence from majority-group plaintiffs has come under scrutiny, with some justices expressing skepticism about the fairness of differing standards based on an employee's identity in discrimination lawsuits.
During Wednesday's arguments, liberal and conservative justices questioned whether Title VII-which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, sex, and other protected characteristics-allows for different standards based on an employee's identity.
Justice Elena Kagan zeroed in on this, pointing out that the Sixth Circuit explicitly said that if Ames had been gay, she would not have needed to meet this heightened standard.
Collection
[
|
...
]