"Few topics ignite stronger opinions from today's workforce than hybrid work. For some leaders, the debate over returning to the office feels like an existential question about culture, collaboration and productivity. For others, it's just plain nostalgia for "the good ol' days." For employees, it's about autonomy, balance and trust. The reality, though, is that the debate about adopting a hybrid work model is no longer significant."
"Flexibility-not compensation-is the top factor influencing today's job seekers. Workers value it so highly, they would accept an average pay cut of 8% to maintain flexible work options. Hybrid work is also the second most common reason people stay with their employer. In a competitive labor market, this model can be the difference between attracting top talent or losing them to a more flexible rival."
The conversation has shifted from whether to adopt hybrid work to how organizations should implement hybrid models to support business outcomes, competitiveness and engagement. Flexibility is the primary factor influencing job seekers, with workers willing to accept an average pay cut of 8% to preserve flexible work options. Hybrid work ranks as the second-most common reason employees stay with an employer and can determine the ability to attract or lose top talent. Research finds that flexibility does not appear to harm equity, productivity or organizational performance, and hybrid employees demonstrate productivity comparable to fully in-office peers. Return-to-office mandates have not produced meaningful financial gains. Mental health outcomes favor hybrid models. Seramount conducted a study on the mental health crisis and found that employees reported lower levels of personal well-being.
Read at Forbes
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]