According to the survey, around 40% of people expressed support for rationing 'emissions-intensive' products like meat and fuel, revealing a growing acceptance of this drastic measure to combat climate change.
Oskar Lindgren highlights that rationing could be perceived as fair since it ensures equal access to limited resources, regardless of an individual's income or wealth position.
The survey indicates that the public's willingness to accept fuel rationing is nearly on par with their willingness to accept increased taxes, suggesting a potential shift in how people view climate policy.
Researchers suggest that global compliance with the Paris Agreement will necessitate governmental measures beyond taxes and subsidies, making rationing a viable and equitable alternative.
Collection
[
|
...
]