The primary argument of The New York Times states that OpenAI's use of their content for training LLMs directly competes with their ability to monetize through digital advertising.
OpenAI contends that their use of copyrighted material falls under 'fair use,' which allows usage that creates new content without directly competing with original works.
The judge emphasized the potential impact of this case on the digital media ecosystem, noting its significance in defining what constitutes fair use in generative AI.
The New York Times presents evidence, claiming OpenAI reproduces verbatim language from their articles without attribution, questioning the legality of such practices.
Collection
[
|
...
]