The article explores the discrepancies in loneliness measurement, highlighting that different tools can yield vastly different results. For instance, two major studies on loneliness conducted in 2022 produced rates differing by 8 percentage points across countries. The author argues that conflicting results stem from the use of both single-item and multi-item measurement tools, which often lack correlation, revealing that they capture disparate experiences. To formulate effective evidence-based policies, there's an urgent need for more reliable measurement instruments that consider cultural interpretations and personal experiences of loneliness.
Evidence-based policy requires better measurement tools that capture loneliness in all its complexity, ensuring accurate understanding of prevalence rates and the factors affecting loneliness.
Even within the same study, different measurement approaches often tell conflicting stories, showing that various loneliness measures rarely overlap significantly or reflect the same experiences.
Collection
[
|
...
]