Meta faces scrutiny for allegedly suppressing content from reproductive health organizations like Aid Access and Plan C, resulting in removals, shadow banning, and account suspensions on Facebook and Instagram. The removals hinder these organizations' abilities to provide critical resources for abortion-related help. Critics, including Sen. Ruben Gallego, argue that Meta's moderation practices disproportionately target reproductive health content, coinciding with the company's rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. This situation raised significant concerns about Meta's reliability as a platform for socially driven missions, impacting real lives and urgent needs.
"Every time our content is taken down, someone doesn't get the help they need...The consequences aren't just reputational - they're human." - Martha Dimitratou, Women on Web and Plan C.
The timing of these incidents coincides with Meta's rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and fact-checking measures, raising doubts about reliability.
Critics argue that reproductive health content is being disproportionately targeted, leading to a broader backlash from public officials and users.
Senator Ruben Gallego tweeted, 'This isn't free speech. It's actually just stroking the ego of a new administration while risking the health and lives of women.'
Collection
[
|
...
]