The California Court of Appeal established that claims for defamation linked to wrongful termination cannot succeed if the employee does not prove damage beyond job loss. In the case of Hearn v. PG&E, the plaintiff asserted defamation after being wrongfully terminated, but the court ruled that his claims could not proceed based solely on the same issues involved in his termination. This ruling clarifies the legal boundaries regarding simultaneous claims of wrongful termination and defamation, emphasizing the necessity of proving distinct harm to prevail on defamation charges.
Post-termination defamation claims tied to the same conduct as wrongful termination cannot lead to recovery if the employee does not demonstrate damages beyond losing their job.
The California Court of Appeal emphasized that a defamation claim must involve harm beyond employment loss, reaffirming a key legal principle in employee claims.
Collection
[
|
...
]