NLRB GC Memo Calls For Aggressive Retroactive Make-Whole Remedies Against Employers
Non-compete agreements violate worker rights under NLRA, according to NLRB's new directives.
General Counsel advocates for broad remedies for employees affected by non-compete agreements.
NLRB Reinstates Prior "Clear and Unmistakable" Standard For Waivers of Statutory Right to Bargain
The NLRB's Endurance decision reinstates a previous bargaining standard, favoring collective bargaining over unilateral employer changes to working conditions.
NLRB GC Memo Calls For Aggressive Retroactive Make-Whole Remedies Against Employers
Non-compete agreements violate worker rights under NLRA, according to NLRB's new directives.
General Counsel advocates for broad remedies for employees affected by non-compete agreements.
NLRB Reinstates Prior "Clear and Unmistakable" Standard For Waivers of Statutory Right to Bargain
The NLRB's Endurance decision reinstates a previous bargaining standard, favoring collective bargaining over unilateral employer changes to working conditions.
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 20: Biden Administration Announces $3 Billion Advanced Battery Investment; Fifth Circuit Affirms Fair Use Ruling on Dog Art Kits; and California Passes State Bills on Digital Replica Rights
Federal Circuit's ruling emphasizes adherence to statutory presumption of patent validity.
California joins several states in protecting against unauthorized digital replicas of individuals.
A Court's Inherent Authority is Not to Be a Broad Reservoir of Power
PSP's case was dismissed, leading to sanctions for filing a frivolous lawsuit under the district court's inherent authority.
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 20: Biden Administration Announces $3 Billion Advanced Battery Investment; Fifth Circuit Affirms Fair Use Ruling on Dog Art Kits; and California Passes State Bills on Digital Replica Rights
Federal Circuit's ruling emphasizes adherence to statutory presumption of patent validity.
California joins several states in protecting against unauthorized digital replicas of individuals.
A Court's Inherent Authority is Not to Be a Broad Reservoir of Power
PSP's case was dismissed, leading to sanctions for filing a frivolous lawsuit under the district court's inherent authority.
Delays in judicial decisions, while frustrating, can sometimes lead to beneficial outcomes by conserving resources and allowing parties to resolve disputes.
What we know as 28,000 Northern Rail fare evasion prosecutions thrown out
Northern Rail prosecution convictions for rail evasion have been overturned due to unlawful practices, affecting tens of thousands of passengers.
Microsoft Unable to Launch Xbox Store on Android Due to Court Order Stay
Microsoft's plans for an Xbox mobile storefront are delayed due to a court's stay on the Play Store overhaul.
Judges Don't Always Act As A Rubber Stamp
Judges exercise discretion in granting requests, regardless of lack of opposition, emphasizing the need for a thorough understanding of legal procedures.
Halloween House Of Horrors Channels Supreme Court
Halloween costumes reflect anxieties over regulatory decisions in environmental law, especially the implications of Chevron deference.
Residents vow to fight back after 'Pillowcase Rapist' is ordered released in their community
Local activists are fighting against the court-ordered placement of sexual predators in their community.
The community remains engaged in advocacy efforts to oppose similar future cases.
E.U. top court rules Apple, Google owe billions in back taxes and fines
The EU Court has ruled against Apple for unpaid taxes, marking a significant regulatory victory for the European Union.
Google's antitrust fine reinforcement solidifies the EU's commitment to regulating technology giants effectively.
Implications of Mahram v. The Kroger Co.: A Closer Look at Arbitration Agreements
The Mahram v. The Kroger Co. ruling clarifies that arbitration agreements do not automatically extend to third parties unless specified.
CDF Labor Law LLP
California Supreme Court rules against voiding arbitration agreements solely due to unconscionable terms; rather, they should be assessed and, if possible, severed.
Implications of Mahram v. The Kroger Co.: A Closer Look at Arbitration Agreements
The Mahram v. The Kroger Co. ruling clarifies that arbitration agreements do not automatically extend to third parties unless specified.
CDF Labor Law LLP
California Supreme Court rules against voiding arbitration agreements solely due to unconscionable terms; rather, they should be assessed and, if possible, severed.
Employers Score Another Win Against FTC, But Noncompete Ban Looms
Employers won limited injunctions against FTC enforcement on non-compete agreements, with broader implications pending after the Ryan court decision.
Germany Grapples With Difficult Decision' in Prisoner Swap
Germany released a convicted Russian killer in a controversial prison exchange with Russia, causing emotional distress to the victim's family and raising concerns about political implications.