Island Intellectual Property has submitted a supplemental brief to the Supreme Court under Rule 15.8, challenging current Federal Circuit practices regarding summary judgment standards and one-word Rule 36 affirmances. The brief references a growing number of certiorari petitions that echo its concerns about how these practices affect patent eligibility cases. As the Supreme Court prepares to decide on these issues during its conference on March 21, 2025, the implications of their decision could resonate throughout the patent system, prompting a closer examination of how cases are reviewed and decided.
Island Intellectual Property argues that the Federal Circuit’s loose summary judgment standards and one-word Rule 36 affirmances hinder proper judicial review, seeking clarity from the Supreme Court.
The supplemental brief submitted to the Supreme Court draws attention to the need for revisiting the Federal Circuit's practices, underscoring the implications for patent eligibility cases.
Citing an increasing number of similar certiorari petitions, the brief emphasizes that these concerns resonate beyond Island IP, reflecting broader legal challenges faced within America's patent system.
The Supreme Court is set to decide on this matter during its next conference, which is scheduled for March 21, 2025.
Collection
[
|
...
]