CAFC Upholds Barclays' Claim to LEHMAN BROTHERS Marks
Briefly

"The mere fact that Tiger Lily's whisky customers have not affirmatively said that they are confused by 'ask[ing] for a banking product or service' or 'indicat[ing] that they felt deceived,' does not prove that customers have not in fact been confused about whether the whisky is affiliated with Lehman Brothers; the 'absence of evidence is not always evidence of absence.'"
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law
[
add
]
[
|
|
]