The recent verdict in Energy Transfer v. Greenpeace marks a troubling precedent for free speech in America. After a jury found Greenpeace liable for $667 million in damages stemming from its involvement in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, advocates warn that the ruling could chill public dissent. Given how severely the awarded damages surpassed Energy Transfer's requests, the verdict signals that peaceful protests could lead to staggeringly punitive financial repercussions. As critiques arise, the case illustrates a growing trend of corporate power in suppressing civil liberties, raising concerns for activists nationwide.
The jury's verdict awarded damages far beyond what Energy Transfer sought, sending a clear message: public protest can result in crushing financial consequences.
This recent case highlights how censorship poses a significant threat not only from governments but increasingly from powerful corporations.
Collection
[
|
...
]