5 Reasons Why Organizations Insist On Investing In Failed Learning Strategies

"It is often not that hard to identify a "dead horse" within an organization, whether it is an onboarding system that doesn't set up new hires for success or a compliance course that has not eliminated workplace errors. However, the distance between recognizing a redundant or outright harmful program, system, or initiative and actually taking measures to address it is often much larger than we think."

"You may think that insisting on riding an L&D "dead horse" will only cost you time. However, there are many more negative consequences that your businesses will come face-to-face with sooner or later. Lost engagement: Even if they don't have much experience with training programs, it is not hard to discern when learning materials are outdated or poorly designed. And once this realization sinks in, learners lose their motivation, participation drops, and your organization's entire L&D strategy loses its credibility."

"Financial impact: You may think that updating or replacing failed learning programs is an expense you can't afford. However, this doesn't take into account the profit loss caused by your company's lack of innovation. Investments in modern training methods, such as experiential learning or immersive platforms, quickly pay off in learning outcomes and performance improvement. Decreased competitive edge: Holding on to older training methods and materials prevents your workforce from adapting to technological advancements and industry demands."

Organizations can often identify redundant or harmful learning programs but fail to act because psychological, structural, and resource barriers create resistance to change. Persisting with ineffective L&D erodes learner engagement as outdated or poorly designed materials reduce motivation, participation, and credibility of training efforts. Financially, maintaining failing programs masks profit losses tied to lack of innovation, while investments in experiential or immersive methods produce measurable learning and performance gains. Reliance on older training approaches diminishes workforce adaptability to technological shifts and industry demands, weakening competitive position. The combined cultural, financial, and performance costs make inaction expensive and risky.

Read at eLearning Industry