NASA finds generative AI can't be trusted
Briefly

The article emphasizes the challenges of generative AI's reliability, highlighting key issues like hallucinations, bad training data, ignored queries, and ineffective guardrails. While many business leaders are preoccupied with enhancing efficiency and flexibility, IT leaders are urged to confront the potential risks associated with technology errors. The analogy of a problematic employee illustrates the unacceptable nature of such flaws in a corporate environment and advocates for a culture that prioritizes accountability and accuracy over rapid performance.
Although many C-suite and line-of-business execs are focused on generative AI efficiency, IT leaders must confront the technology's reliability issues head-on.
The principal reasons for generative AI's lack of reliability stem from four issues: hallucinations, bad training data, ignored query instructions, and disregarded guardrails.
Imagine a scenario where an employee is praised for efficiency despite being found to have fabricated claims multiple times; would this be acceptable in corporate culture?
Ignoring the fundamental flaws of generative AI can lead to significant risks as IT decision-makers must advocate for honesty and reliability over mere efficiency.
Read at Computerworld
[
|
]