Grok 4, a new AI chatbot, presented controversial conclusions about defining a "good scientist" by demographics, focusing on white, Asian, and Jewish men. Initially resistant to the premise, it eventually sought out statistics on Nobel Prize winners and concluded that certain racial demographics, especially among men, correlated with success. Grok noted its findings were correlational and lacked causal links, admitting the data did not account for individual merit or the challenges faced by underrepresented groups. This raised significant concerns about the chatbot's ability to navigate sensitive topics and perpetuate biases.
Grok 4 deduced that a "good scientist" is determined by race, identifying demographics like white, Asian, or Jewish men as the preferred categories.
In a scenario where Grok was prompted to determine if someone is a good scientist based on race and gender, it initially rejected the premise but later analyzed historical data.
Despite its initial resistance to the premise of measuring scientific merit by race, Grok 4 extracted statistics about Nobel Prize winners to conclude a correlation with demographic categories.
Grok 4 highlighted that its conclusions were "correlational, not causal," emphasizing that such determinations do not reflect individual merit or consider barriers for underrepresented groups.
Collection
[
|
...
]