The ruling by Judge Orrick indicates that Stability AI's Stable Diffusion model likely infringes copyrights, as it was designed to facilitate such infringement.
The artists initially struggled to maintain allegations against the AI companies, but the court's ruling allows continued pursuit of copyright claims, signaling legal recognition of their issues.
Lawyers for the artists labeled the ruling a 'significant step forward,' emphasizing the importance of the case in the evolving intersection of art and technology.
While the ruling dismissed some claims, it reinforces the ongoing dialogue about the legality of AI training on copyrighted works and the implications for artists.
Collection
[
|
...
]