#project-2025

#project-2025

The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 undermines federal worker protections and seeks to gather politically sensitive information on government employees.

Maryland's abortion access measures contrast sharply with potential federal restrictions under a Trump administration, revealing a struggle between state rights and federal authority.

Kamala Harris's claims about Trump's interference in pregnancies stem from misinterpretations of Project 2025, which only emphasizes monitoring pregnancy outcomes, not continuous surveillance.

Trump's return to the White House could lead to significant environmental policy rollbacks, echoing his prior administration's approach.

The outcome of the Nov. 5 vote will significantly impact climate policies and the future of energy in America.

NOAA is essential for accurate weather data and emergency alerts, impacting daily decisions and safety amidst increasing climate change challenges.

The Heritage Foundation and conservative movement are fully supporting Trump's agenda related to Project 2025, despite his public disavowal during the campaign.

During the presidential debate, Harris highlighted Trump's association with Project 2025, arguing it poses a significant threat to American governance.

Project 2025 outlines a conservative roadmap for U.S. government overhaul, reflecting overlapping goals with Trump's agenda while highlighting key ideological differences.

Vice President Harris criticized Trump for alleged ties to Project 2025, a contentious conservative policy guide, which Trump denies having read or authored.

Rightwing groups, including the Heritage Foundation, aim to influence Trump's staffing and policies despite his denials.

Project 2025, an initiative by the Heritage Foundation, is anticipated to be central to Trump's second presidency agenda.

Immigrant advocates oppose Trump's 'Project 2025', fearing mass deportations will devastate New York's economy and social fabric.

Trump distances himself from Project 2025 while its proposals threaten to weaponize the DOJ against political opponents and reshape democratic institutions.

The ad campaign targets young male voters on porn sites, linking Trump to efforts to ban pornography.

Kamala Harris's ad criticizes Trump's policies, claiming they will harm middle-class Americans and benefit the ultra-rich.

Trump's support for working-class issues contradicts his business and presidential record regarding overtime pay.

The article warns about the potential dangers of Trump's agenda and emphasizes the importance of progress over regression.

Project 2025 is a culmination of a decades-long campaign to expand executive power, originating from Richard Nixon's presidency.

The upcoming Harris-Trump debate will focus on contrasting visions for America, especially regarding immigration and Trump's Project 2025.

Harris attacks Trump on healthcare, claiming he'd cut coverage for pre-existing conditions and Social Security, linking his policies to the controversial Project 2025.

Project 2025 may help Trump create his own deep state to succeed in the presidency.

Vice President Harris emphasizes the importance of restoring Roe v. Wade amidst discussions of Trump’s influence on abortion rights.

Trump claims Project 2025 does not reflect his priorities despite shared ideological themes.

There are notable differences in policy specifics between Trump's campaign and Project 2025.

Roberts advocates burning away perceived liberal influence in American institutions through incendiary language and imagery in his new book.

Violent rhetoric from conservatives threatens political strategies and safety, as highlighted by the fallout from comments made by Heritage Foundation's Kevin Roberts regarding Project 2025.

Trumprepeatedly denied knowledge of right-wing immigration policies, despite their close ties to his campaign advisers and their implications on mass deportations.

Changes to U.S. immigration policy could significantly impact MLB player recruitment and the composition of postseason teams.

The Project 2025 plan poses significant threats to democracy and civil liberties for all Americans.

The DNC is targeting LGBTQ+ voters on Grindr to oppose Republicans' extreme agenda threatening their rights.

DeAngelis' actions and past raise questions about hypocrisy in advocating for school choice while opposing LGBTQ+ protections.

The Gender Liberation March protested against Project 2025, advocating for bodily autonomy and opposing increased executive power under a potential Trump administration.

Project 2025 poses a significant threat to LGBTQ+ rights by promoting harmful policies targeting queer individuals, under the pretext of child protection.

The upcoming election is crucial for protecting democracy and civil rights against authoritarianism.

The upcoming election is crucial for democracy and civil rights, influenced significantly by conservative agendas.

The upcoming election poses a critical threat to democracy and civil rights, influenced by Project 2025's attempts to normalize authoritarian practices.

The porn industry is mobilizing against Project 2025, aiming to protect their rights and influence the upcoming election.

A campaign called 'Hands Off My Porn' aims to challenge proposed laws criminalizing pornography by spending $100,000 on targeted digital ads.

Paul Dans critiques Trump's campaign strategies, blaming top advisers for missteps that threaten Trump's 2024 chances.

Democrats are using aerial banners to highlight concerns about Project 2025, aiming to associate it with the Republican Party's extreme positions.

The Republican agenda in Project 2025 contradicts claims of pro-worker support, focusing instead on corporate interests.

House Democrats are using Project 2025 to influence voter perceptions against Republicans in key election districts as a strategic campaign move.