Aftershocks of Supreme Court's Immunity Ruling Echo in New Trump CasesThe recent Supreme Court decision expands presidential power, impacting executive authority significantly.
Appeals court rules Trump can fire board members of independent agenciesThe D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that restrictions on presidential firings of independent agency members are unconstitutional.
Opinion | Trump's Power Grab Could Provoke America's Fourth Great Constitutional RuptureAmerican constitutional history is characterized by disruption and evolution rather than a linear, idealized process of progress.
Trump Can't Strip Natives of Our US Citizenship, but He Will Try to Take Our LandsThe Trump administration questioned birthright citizenship for Indigenous people using outdated legal precedents.
Aftershocks of Supreme Court's Immunity Ruling Echo in New Trump CasesThe recent Supreme Court decision expands presidential power, impacting executive authority significantly.
Appeals court rules Trump can fire board members of independent agenciesThe D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that restrictions on presidential firings of independent agency members are unconstitutional.
Opinion | Trump's Power Grab Could Provoke America's Fourth Great Constitutional RuptureAmerican constitutional history is characterized by disruption and evolution rather than a linear, idealized process of progress.
Trump Can't Strip Natives of Our US Citizenship, but He Will Try to Take Our LandsThe Trump administration questioned birthright citizenship for Indigenous people using outdated legal precedents.
REX petitions for a rehearing in lawsuit against NAR, ZillowREX argues that the panel misinterpreted the no-commingling rule, viewing it inaccurately as a non-violation of antitrust laws.
The Return of a Mandate on Patent Infringement Precludes Further Consideration of Issues Actually DecidedDistrict courts cannot reconsider issues already decided by appellate courts without specific instructions when the case is remanded.
En Banc Review in Allergan: Questioning the Federal Circuit's New ODP Safe HarborSun Pharma's en banc petition contests a controversial Federal Circuit decision regarding obviousness-type double patenting and written description support.The Allergan decision may set problematic precedents for patent families and disclosure requirements.
How to Satisfy Constitutional and Statutory Standing Requirements in Patent Infringement ActionsStanding requirements for patent infringement remain complex and can depend heavily on the specifics of rights assignment and licensing.The Intellectual Tech v. Zebra decision adds clarity to confusing standing issues in patent law, particularly regarding third-party rights.
The Return of a Mandate on Patent Infringement Precludes Further Consideration of Issues Actually DecidedDistrict courts cannot reconsider issues already decided by appellate courts without specific instructions when the case is remanded.
En Banc Review in Allergan: Questioning the Federal Circuit's New ODP Safe HarborSun Pharma's en banc petition contests a controversial Federal Circuit decision regarding obviousness-type double patenting and written description support.The Allergan decision may set problematic precedents for patent families and disclosure requirements.
How to Satisfy Constitutional and Statutory Standing Requirements in Patent Infringement ActionsStanding requirements for patent infringement remain complex and can depend heavily on the specifics of rights assignment and licensing.The Intellectual Tech v. Zebra decision adds clarity to confusing standing issues in patent law, particularly regarding third-party rights.
How Trump's EPA hopes to avoid greenhouse gas regulationsThe EPA's endangerment findings on greenhouse gases have led to no regulations, reflecting ongoing complexities in climate policy.The Supreme Court's reluctance to overturn previous rulings on greenhouse gas regulations indicates a nuanced legal landscape.
Employer Not Required To Initiate Arbitration Following Court-Ordered ArbitrationThe California Court of Appeal clarified the responsibility to initiate arbitration lies with the plaintiffs, not the employer.
An Important Judicial Tool Mysteriously Goes Missing at the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court recently used a summary reversal, a previously common judicial tool that has significantly declined in usage over the years.
Alito Versus Law And Science - emptywheelImpartiality is crucial in the legal system; Alito is criticized for lacking it, especially in the case of Roe v. Wade.
Arizona's abortion ban could bring zombie laws back to life in other statesOld, unenforced laws can resurface if legal precedents are overturned, as seen with the enforcement of a 1864 abortion ban in Arizona.
An Important Judicial Tool Mysteriously Goes Missing at the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court recently used a summary reversal, a previously common judicial tool that has significantly declined in usage over the years.
Alito Versus Law And Science - emptywheelImpartiality is crucial in the legal system; Alito is criticized for lacking it, especially in the case of Roe v. Wade.
Arizona's abortion ban could bring zombie laws back to life in other statesOld, unenforced laws can resurface if legal precedents are overturned, as seen with the enforcement of a 1864 abortion ban in Arizona.
Thomson Reuters wins AI copyright ruling over training dataThomson Reuters won a partial judgment against Ross Intelligence, denying fair use for AI training on copyrighted material.
How AI Copyright Law Is Being Guided By Spirits From Atlantis | DefectorCopyright law is struggling to keep pace with AI-generated works, resulting in denials of copyright protection for non-human creators.
Thomson Reuters wins AI copyright ruling over training dataThomson Reuters won a partial judgment against Ross Intelligence, denying fair use for AI training on copyrighted material.
How AI Copyright Law Is Being Guided By Spirits From Atlantis | DefectorCopyright law is struggling to keep pace with AI-generated works, resulting in denials of copyright protection for non-human creators.
Federal Circuit Outcomes from the Past Four YearsThe Federal Circuit's case outputs show 44% Non-Precedential Opinions, indicating limited precedential impact compared to 18% that are Precedential.
Beatriz v El Salvador: the abortion case that could set a precedent across Latin AmericaMorena Herrera's advocacy for abortion rights faces challenges from misinformation and a restrictive legal environment in El Salvador.
New Mexico supreme court strikes down local abortion pill restrictionsThe New Mexico Supreme Court struck down local ordinances aimed at limiting abortion pill distribution, affirming state legislative authority over reproductive healthcare regulations.
Beatriz v El Salvador: the abortion case that could set a precedent across Latin AmericaMorena Herrera's advocacy for abortion rights faces challenges from misinformation and a restrictive legal environment in El Salvador.
New Mexico supreme court strikes down local abortion pill restrictionsThe New Mexico Supreme Court struck down local ordinances aimed at limiting abortion pill distribution, affirming state legislative authority over reproductive healthcare regulations.
Aileen Cannon, Judge in Trump Assassination Case, Refuses to Recuse HerselfJudge Aileen M. Cannon maintains her impartiality amidst scrutiny regarding her prior rulings in favor of former President Trump in separate cases.
Special Counsel Asks Appeals Court to Revive Trump Classified Documents Case After Judge Cannon RulingJack Smith urges reinstatement of Trump's classified documents case, asserting Judge Cannon's dismissal contradicts legal precedents and undermines federal governance.
Aileen Cannon, Judge in Trump Assassination Case, Refuses to Recuse HerselfJudge Aileen M. Cannon maintains her impartiality amidst scrutiny regarding her prior rulings in favor of former President Trump in separate cases.
Special Counsel Asks Appeals Court to Revive Trump Classified Documents Case After Judge Cannon RulingJack Smith urges reinstatement of Trump's classified documents case, asserting Judge Cannon's dismissal contradicts legal precedents and undermines federal governance.
Judge Decides To Just Make Up The Rules As She Goes AlongJudicial appointees like Kathryn Mizelle risk undermining legal precedents with actions seen as overreach, raising qualification concerns.
Charges against accused school shooter's father seen as legal 'breakthrough'The case against the Crumbley parents signifies a pivotal moment in legal accountability for gun owner negligence leading to youth violence.
A dangerous precedent? Telegram CEO Pavel Durov's arrest stokes speech warTech founder Pavel Durov's arrest in France sparks debate over online platform responsibility for user speech.The legal implications of Durov's case question existing norms regarding tech company accountability.Global leaders are increasingly scrutinizing tech companies in response to criminal activities facilitated by their platforms.
TikTok's Free Speech Argument Has Support Among Legal ScholarsThe First Amendment might shield TikTok against the divestment requirement due to lack of evidence of real harm.
Holding Onto Your Bitcoin: Don't Get Killed On TaxesKeep detailed records of bitcoin transactions' cost basis for tax planning.IRS closely monitors bitcoin transactions via exchanges and legal precedents.
Peter Schey, longtime Los Angeles champion of immigrant rights, dead at 77Peter Schey dedicated his career to championing immigrant rights, including access to public services and education.He founded organizations and led landmark cases that set important legal precedents for immigrant rights and protection.