The article discusses the implications of the Trump v. United States decision, which provided President Trump substantial immunity from prosecution while also amplifying presidential power. Despite being primarily about immunity, legal scholars argue its legacy is more profound, affecting how presidential authority is viewed under the law. Chief Justice Roberts' opinion emphasized the president's unique role as a governmental branch with broad powers, setting a precedent that could empower future administrations to assert more control and reduce checks from Congress or the judiciary.
The decision’s legacy will amplify presidential power, enabling the new administration to test its limits even in the broader context of executive action.
Chief Justice Roberts argued for an energetic president with responsibilities unconstrained by Congress and the courts, positioning the presidency as a unique branch of government.
Collection
[
|
...
]