Supreme Court Rejects Trump-Era Ban on Gun Bump Stocks
The Supreme Court struck down the ban on bump stocks, ruling the Trump administration overstepped its authority, hindering efforts to tackle gun violence.
Trump Judge Rules Guns Are Sort Of Like Airbags. Nice, Murderous Airbags.
Republican judges often dismiss crucial gun regulations, misinterpreting the Second Amendment, despite evident societal risks involved in widespread weapon ownership.
The Second Amendment, as Applied - emptywheel
The Second Amendment applies to modern firearms, influencing legal interpretations and the dismissal of gun possession charges.
Supreme Court Rejects Trump-Era Ban on Gun Bump Stocks
The Supreme Court struck down the ban on bump stocks, ruling the Trump administration overstepped its authority, hindering efforts to tackle gun violence.
Trump Judge Rules Guns Are Sort Of Like Airbags. Nice, Murderous Airbags.
Republican judges often dismiss crucial gun regulations, misinterpreting the Second Amendment, despite evident societal risks involved in widespread weapon ownership.
The Second Amendment, as Applied - emptywheel
The Second Amendment applies to modern firearms, influencing legal interpretations and the dismissal of gun possession charges.
Wisconsin supreme court seems hostile to 1849 abortion ban in oral arguments
Wisconsin Supreme Court may find 1849 abortion ban unenforceable amid changing judicial landscape and ongoing legal contests.
What a Georgia Judge's Decision to Strike Down Six-Week Abortion Ban Means
A Georgia judge's ruling against the six-week abortion ban highlights increasing judicial support for reproductive rights and may indicate broader changes nationwide.
Wisconsin supreme court seems hostile to 1849 abortion ban in oral arguments
Wisconsin Supreme Court may find 1849 abortion ban unenforceable amid changing judicial landscape and ongoing legal contests.
What a Georgia Judge's Decision to Strike Down Six-Week Abortion Ban Means
A Georgia judge's ruling against the six-week abortion ban highlights increasing judicial support for reproductive rights and may indicate broader changes nationwide.
The Supreme Court's most significant decision was overruling Chevron deference, reducing power given to administrative agencies and restoring balance in legal interpretations.
FCC and the broadband industry argue net neutrality's future
The Supreme Court's recent decisions complicate the FCC's authority to enforce net neutrality, making its future uncertain.
Feldman: The Supreme Court ghost gun arguments were cringeworthy
Ghost guns should be classified as firearms under federal law to enhance public safety.
A Writer Sees Leniency in the Supreme Court's Approach to Public Corruption
The Supreme Court's recent rulings suggest a leniency towards politicians involved in public corruption, emphasizing a narrow interpretation of federal law.
Supreme Court unanimously rules to keep Trump on Colorado ballot
The five conservative justices took an expansive approach in their ruling on Section 3 of the case involving Donald Trump's ballot access. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson chose not to address those key questions.
How The Newest Supreme Court Justices Compare: A Look At Each Of Their Respective First Two Years On The Court
Recent Supreme Court appointments have significant implications for legal interpretations and civil liberties, highlighting a division between conservative and progressive ideologies.
Overturning Chevron May Prove Pyrrhic
The Supreme Court's most significant decision was overruling Chevron deference, reducing power given to administrative agencies and restoring balance in legal interpretations.
FCC and the broadband industry argue net neutrality's future
The Supreme Court's recent decisions complicate the FCC's authority to enforce net neutrality, making its future uncertain.
Feldman: The Supreme Court ghost gun arguments were cringeworthy
Ghost guns should be classified as firearms under federal law to enhance public safety.
A Writer Sees Leniency in the Supreme Court's Approach to Public Corruption
The Supreme Court's recent rulings suggest a leniency towards politicians involved in public corruption, emphasizing a narrow interpretation of federal law.
Supreme Court unanimously rules to keep Trump on Colorado ballot
The five conservative justices took an expansive approach in their ruling on Section 3 of the case involving Donald Trump's ballot access. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson chose not to address those key questions.
How The Newest Supreme Court Justices Compare: A Look At Each Of Their Respective First Two Years On The Court
Recent Supreme Court appointments have significant implications for legal interpretations and civil liberties, highlighting a division between conservative and progressive ideologies.
True Respect for Textualism Requires Patent Eligibility Reform
The discussion on patent eligibility highlights the tension between textualism and judicial activism, particularly in how courts interpret patent laws.
To 'Obtain' or Not to 'Obtain'? That is Still the Question
The Federal Circuit applies inconsistent interpretations of 'obtain' in patent and trademark contexts, leading to confusion regarding legal standards.
True Respect for Textualism Requires Patent Eligibility Reform
The discussion on patent eligibility highlights the tension between textualism and judicial activism, particularly in how courts interpret patent laws.
To 'Obtain' or Not to 'Obtain'? That is Still the Question
The Federal Circuit applies inconsistent interpretations of 'obtain' in patent and trademark contexts, leading to confusion regarding legal standards.
Supreme Court Candidate Calls Out Opponent's Busted Textualism
Ohio's Supreme Court races feature significant competition that could change the court's philosophical balance, highlighted by the case of 'boneless wings'.