#14th-amendment

#14th-amendment

Donald Trump seeks to abolish birthright citizenship, a right guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, despite its long-standing status in U.S. law.

President-elect Donald Trump vows to end birthright citizenship, citing immigration concerns, but faces significant constitutional and legal challenges.

Trump plans to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, but legal and constitutional hurdles make this unlikely.

Trump aims to end birthright citizenship, viewing it as an incentive for illegal immigration, but legal challenges may prevent such changes.

Trump aims to end birthright citizenship, a right that has been in place for over 150 years.

The Supreme Court will deliberate on Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors, questioning its compliance with the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.

Justice Sotomayor emphasized the inherent risks in medical treatments, likening them to taking aspirin, during a case about minors' access to gender-affirming care.

House Republicans are trying to bolster Trump's claim that he did nothing wrong in connection to the events of January 6th.

They have signed onto a resolution declaring that Mr. Trump did not engage in insurrection in an effort to influence courts and state election officials.

Democratic leaders are prioritizing a peaceful transfer of power over challenging Trump's eligibility regarding insurrection, revealing a potential strategy misstep.

Republicans on SCOTUS aligning with Trump in legal cases.

Majority decision in Colorado ballot case favors Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts has prioritized aiding Trump politically, undermining judicial integrity and consensus-building in the Supreme Court.

The 14th Amendment is a foundational element of civil rights legislation and legal precedents in the United States.

The Supreme Court appears likely to overturn a ruling that removed Donald Trump from Colorado's presidential ballot

The justices were receptive to arguments that the provision in question does not apply to presidents and requires separate Congressional enforcement

Donald Trump is urging the Supreme Court to reverse a ruling that barred him from the primary ballot in Colorado and declare him eligible to seek and hold the office of the presidency.

The case turns on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars those who engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding office, unless Congress removes the prohibition with a two-thirds vote.

The Supreme Court appears skeptical of Colorado's effort to keep Donald Trump off the ballot

The court is considering who should decide the consequences of Trump's conduct: Washington, individual states, Congress, or the electorate

President Trump is considered an insurrectionist by MSNBC legal analyst Neal Katyal.

Trump's legal arguments for the Supreme Court case about banning him from the ballot are weak.

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided that states cannot disqualify former President Trump based on the 14th Amendment.

The ruling angered Republicans who saw the lawsuits as undemocratic and rallied support for Trump's candidacy.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear important cases this month, including Trump v. Anderson and Moody v. NetChoice.

Trump v. Anderson considers whether Trump is disqualified from being president due to the 14th Amendment.

Prominent conservatives view Trump's innocence as irrelevant

US Supreme Court allows Trump to remain on the presidential ballot despite allegations of treason

The US Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado's primary ballot, overturning the state court's decision.

The decision was a significant one as it involved interpreting the 14th amendment with regard to insurrectionist behavior by a candidate.

States cannot bar presidential candidates using the 14th Amendment

U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against federal officeholders.

The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot disqualify Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

The Court emphasized that Congress must pass implementing legislation for Section 3 to be enforced, preventing states from taking independent action.

A unanimous Supreme Court ruling upheld that states can't remove Trump from ballots based on a flawed interpretation of the 14th Amendment.

The ruling emphasizes the importance of fair legal interpretations and highlights the dangers of allowing partisan politics to influence judicial decisions.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution is at odds with Donald Trump's goals of autocratic rule and white male privilege.

Trump has violated multiple parts of the Constitution, including the emoluments clause and appropriations clause.

The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, is the most far-reaching and significant amendment to the Constitution and is at odds with Trump's actions and policies.

Trump has violated not only the 14th Amendment, but also other parts of the Constitution, including the emoluments clause and appropriations clause.

Seth Barrett Tillman's unusual interpretation of the U.S. Constitution is gaining attention in the Supreme Court case regarding Donald Trump's eligibility for Colorado's primary ballot.

Tillman argues that the phrase 'officer of the United States' in the Constitution refers only to appointed positions, not the presidency.

Should states be allowed to remove Donald Trump from the ballot based on the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment?

Should judges limit Trump's use of courtrooms as campaign stops and hate rallies?