#first-amendment-rights

#first-amendment-rights

Trump wants to cut federal funding to Harvard for resisting administration demands.

Harvard stands firm against the Trump administration's controversial requirements.

Harvard University rejects demands to ensure Jewish students' safety, facing federal funding loss.

The institution claims First Amendment rights in its refusal to comply with administration orders.

Judicial intervention protects Mr. Khalil's rights, highlighting due process amid tensions over his pro-Palestinian activism.

Tens of thousands protested across the U.S. against President Trump's administration, highlighting concerns about government policies and social issues.

Court rulings consistently strike down laws censoring the internet, emphasizing the importance of focusing on advancing legislation that solves online privacy and competition issues without limiting users' free speech.

The Supreme Court declined to rule on the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas that would require online platforms to publish political speech they would otherwise remove.

Bipartisan former FCC commissioners criticize current investigation into CBS for potentially infringing on First Amendment rights.

TikTok creators join legal battle against US ban, citing First Amendment rights.

Pro-Palestinian student groups continue to assert their right to hold events despite university censorship and security concerns, particularly surrounding sensitive anniversaries.

Concerns arise over the protection of First Amendment rights for pro-Palestine demonstrators amidst CPD actions during the Democratic National Convention.

Fox News faced legal wins with the dismissal of defamation cases from Hunter Biden and Nina Jankowicz, citing protection of First Amendment rights.

Ryan Reynolds seeks to dismiss Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit, asserting his belief in the accusations against Baldoni.

Sticker Mule is contesting a zoning board decision to block its political sign, claiming it violates free speech rights.

TikTok creators sued the government over a law requiring ByteDance to sell the company, citing First Amendment violations.

Eight TikTok content creators sued the U.S. government over the TikTok ban, citing First Amendment rights.

Congress voted to effectively ban TikTok, creating a legal battle regarding First Amendment rights and national security implications.

A potential TikTok ban due to national security concerns may disrupt content creators' livelihoods and infringe on their First Amendment rights.

Legislation signed by President Biden could force ByteDance to sell TikTok in the U.S., facing a potential ban, raising concerns about First Amendment rights and national security implications.

Libraries are uniting for the first coordinated Day of Action to combat book banning in the U.S. on October 19.

An appellate court ruled Texas cannot ban books from libraries based on content disliked by officials.

Donald Trump is requesting the termination of a gag order imposed during his falsifying records case, citing First Amendment rights.

Trump seeks to move his criminal case to federal court to prevent sentencing before resolution of the matter.

Concerns regarding constitutional violations and First Amendment impacts are central to Trump's legal filing.

The Supreme Court ruling on obstruction charges related to the January 6 Capitol riot may impact the cases of approximately 350 individuals, including Donald Trump, and could also protect First Amendment rights.

Thousands arrested in pro-Palestinian protests at academic institutions. Charges dropped, showing First Amendment rights importance.

Texas is at the center of a Supreme Court case challenging a state law on age verification for porn websites.

The Supreme Court did not block a Texas law requiring age verification for minors' online access to pornography.

The US Supreme Court denied blocking a Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites, affecting Pornhub and other sites, with potential impact on First Amendment rights.

NetChoice, representing major companies, sues Georgia to halt law on high-volume sellers' data collection on online classified sites, citing federal law clash and constitutional issues.

An internet trade group is suing Georgia over a law requiring data on online sellers who collect payments offline.

NetChoice is suing Georgia over a law requiring online classified sites to gather data on high-volume sellers who collect payment offline.

Internet trade group sues Georgia over law requiring data on high-volume sellers who collect offline payments.

NetChoice filed a lawsuit against Georgia's law requiring online classified sites to gather data on high-volume sellers who collect payment offline, citing violations of federal law and First Amendment rights.

NetChoice, representing tech companies, is suing Georgia over a law requiring data collection from online sellers using offline payment methods.

The lawsuit argues the Georgia law violates First Amendment rights and is unconstitutionally vague, seeking a temporary and permanent block from enforcement.