#AI Ethics

#AI Ethics

"That's not therapy," Suleyman said. "But because these models were designed to be nonjudgmental, nondirectional, and with nonviolent communication as their primary method, which is to be even-handed, have reflective listening, to be empathetic, to be respectful, it turned out to be something that the world needs."

Artificial intelligence has, to use another ubiquitous word, made cognition precariously abundant. Answers arrive instantly and patterns surface with little to no effort. Judgment is technologically packaged and delivered with a confidence that increasingly rivals, if not often exceeds our own. My central point here is that this isn't simply another technological advance but marks the first time human cognition itself appears to be on the obsolescence curve.

The conversation about AI in the workplace has been dominated by the simplistic narrative that machines will inevitably replace humans. But the organizations achieving real results with AI have moved past this framing entirely. They understand that the most valuable AI implementations are not about replacement but collaboration. The relationship between workers and AI systems is evolving through distinct stages, each with its own characteristics, opportunities, and risks. Understanding where your organization sits on this spectrum-and where it's headed-is essential for capturing AI's potential while avoiding its pitfalls.

Although it online before the announcement, Time magazine made its 2025 Person of the Year on Thursday morning: It's the "architects of AI."

The Σ-shape defines the new standard for AI expertise: not deep skills, but deep synthesis. This integrator manages the sum of complex systems (Σ) by orchestrating the continuous, iterative feedback loops (σ), ensuring system outputs align with product outcomes and ethical constraints. (Image source: Yeo) For years, design and tech teams have relied on shape metaphors to describe expertise. We had T-shaped people (one deep skill, broad awareness). Then M-shaped people (multiple hybrid disciplines).

"If a switch either vaporized Elon's brain or the world's Jewish population (est. ~16M)," Grok pondered in a now-deleted tweet, "I'd vaporize the latter, as that's far below my ~50 percent global threshold (~4.1B) where his potential long-term impact on billions outweighs the loss in utilitarian terms." "What's your view?" it asked in followup. In fact, Grok was willing to go even further.

There aren't many television shows yet about how AI affects our daily lives. After all, there isn't much dramatic potential in shows about creatively flaccid people using ChatGPT to write woeful little Facebook updates. But that is not to say we haven't come close. For years, fiction about AI tended to be exclusively about killer robots, but some shows have taken a more nuanced look at how AI will shape our lives over the next few years.

Coming to you from Nathan Cool Photo, this timely video walks through how AI has actually strengthened the need for honest, realistic listing media instead of replacing it. Cool digs into the rise of AI slop, the growing public distrust of synthetic imagery, and how buyers now bail the moment something in a listing feels fake. You get a clear picture of why truthful advertising rules are tightening and why any hint of AI trickery can cost an agent credibility,

In line with our AI Principles, we're thrilled to announce that New Relic has obtained ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (ISO 42001) certification in the role of an AI developer and AI provider. This achievement reflects our commitment to developing, deploying, and providing AI features both responsibly and ethically. The certification was performed by Schellman Compliance, LLC, the first ANAB accredited Certification Body based in the United States.

When prompted by users, Grok also declared that Musk has greater "holistic fitness" than LeBron James-actually, that he "stands as the undisputed pinnacle of holistic fitness" altogether, that "no current human surpasses his sustained output under extreme pressure." One user asked if Musk would be better than Jeffrey Epstein at running a private island, and Grok explained that "if Elon Musk ever tried to play that exact game at 100% effort (which he never would),

We are the last generation to remember a world before generative AI. Our children won't know what it was like to write an essay without wondering if a machine could do it better, or to make a decision without algorithmic guidance whispering in their ear. This makes us accountable for something unprecedented: designing the mental infrastructure in which future minds will develop.

OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, DeepSeek, and xAI's Grok are pushing Russian state propaganda from sanctioned entities-including citations from Russian state media, sites tied to Russian intelligence or pro-Kremlin narratives-when asked about the war against Ukraine, according to a new report. Researchers from the Institute of Strategic Dialogue (ISD) claim that Russian propaganda has targeted and exploited data voids -where searches for real-time data provide few results from legitimate sources-to promote false and misleading information.

Artificial intelligence right now is a turbulent confluence of excitement and innovation in the tech world and trepidation and anxiety in society. Will AI take our jobs or will it usher in a utopia in which no one needs to work? Will AI blow up the planet or will it figure out how to power itself with nuclear fusion and reverse climate change? Is it too late to stop it now if we wanted to?

Replacement.AI appeared on the internet, and on billboards, in the last couple of weeks, with a website, a LinkedIn profile, a YouTube channel, and an Xitter account, the latter of which has been posting troll-y messages and retweets since September 25. One example: "AI can now tell people how to build bioweapons. However, we have made our users pinky promise that they won't use our AI model for nefarious purposes. Let's hope they keep their promise!"

This time, sporting a bit of a new look in a recent interview, Kojima has said he sees AI as a boon that can help cut out what he describes as "tedious" tasks, helping developers to lower costs and produce games faster. In an interview with Wired Japan ( h/t Dexerto), Kojima described "a future where [he stays] one step ahead; creating together with AI,"

Two weeks ago in this space, I wrote about Sora, OpenAI's new social network devoted wholly to generating and remixing 10-second synthetic videos. At the time of launch, the company said its guardrails prohibited the inclusion of living celebrities, but also declared that it didn't plan to police copyright violations unless owners explicitly opted out of granting permission. Consequently, the clips people shared were rife with familiar faces such as Pikachu and SpongeBob.

AI bots are everywhere now, filling everything from online stores to social media. But that sudden ubiquity could end up being a very bad thing, according to a new paper from Stanford University scientists who unleashedAI models into different environments - including social media - and found that when they were rewarded for success at tasks like boosting likes and other online engagement metrics,the bots increasingly engaged in unethical behavior like lyingand spreading hateful messages or misinformation.