Inductive reasoning in science implies that even with strong evidence, conclusions may still be false. This inherent uncertainty leads to changing recommendations in fields like nutrition and exercise.
While many strive for absolute certainty in scientific knowledge, the reality remains that we must work from what we know, with all its limitations, toward better understanding.
The issue with induction is that it allows for the possibility of incorrect conclusions. Consequently, the findings in nutrition and exercise sciences are not definitive.
The issue of induction suggests that, despite rigorous research, our conclusions in diet and exercise are at best provisional, subject to change with new evidence.
Collection
[
|
...
]