"AI produces language with no lived experience behind it, creating what amounts to organized absence. The risk isn't that AI is wrong but that its unearned fluency quietly erodes the weight of real understanding."
"Language typically carries an implicit guarantee, a connection. Words are the evidence of a life behind them. The connection is now at risk of being severed."
"Large language models generate sentences that are functionally correct, but the link between expression and experience is gone. They're assembled from patterns that approximate it."
"The human brain doesn't encounter this shift as a neutral or passive observer. We're wired to fill that absence, projecting understanding and presence onto statistical output."
Artificial intelligence produces language devoid of personal experience, creating a phenomenon termed organized absence. This absence prompts humans to project understanding onto AI-generated content, despite its lack of genuine insight. The risk lies not in AI being incorrect, but in its fluency undermining the value of authentic understanding. Language typically reflects lived experiences, but AI-generated sentences lack this connection, resulting in a significant shift in how language is perceived and understood in human interactions.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]